no notes returned

The substantive review describes Alana as a “stunning hidden gem” and says it “perfectly balances modern luxury with the calm, community-driven atmosphere” of Bay Harbor Islands. The available review text does not provide resident-level evidence about management speed, security, maintenance response, or common-area upkeep.

Structural and systems feedback is mixed. Residents reported that buildings and living areas are generally maintained well and that some maintenance requests were completed quickly, but multiple reviews describe elevators being out for a month or longer; one states, “Elevators out of service for months,” and another reports unresolved refrigerator/freezer problems.

Daily life reviews praise the “pool and gym,” friendly staff, quiet atmosphere and walkable shopping, with several residents describing a clean and welcoming community. Operational complaints are substantial, however: residents report that the office sometimes does not answer, the gate and key fobs were broken, pet waste remained for weeks, and parking could require “20-30 minutes” of searching.

Most guest feedback describes the apartments as “modern, spotless clean” and says the property is “secure and well maintained”; one guest specifically praised “Strong AC.” A December 2020 resident review alleged “fixtures falling from the walls,” “outlets that don't work,” and trash/package rooms “filled with bugs,” but this is an old single report rather than evidence of a current building-wide condition.

Guests consistently praise the location, cleanliness and access: one called it “a very secure and well maintained property,” while another said the apartment was “very clean” and the host was “very responsive.” Counterevidence is concentrated in the resident material: a 2020 reviewer described management as confrontational and package handling as inconvenient, and recent guest feedback notes outside highway/rail noise; these findings should be treated cautiously because the resident complaints are old and the building has substantial short-stay use.

Residents describe the building as modern, clean and well designed, with one reviewer calling the finishes and common spaces “really nice.” The physical-condition feedback is nevertheless uneven: reviewers report “2 of 4 elevators down,” “extremely thin walls,” audible toilets and appliances, and early construction defects including stained carpets and incomplete security/access work.

Daily-life reviews repeatedly praise the staff—“Very kind and polite staff”—as well as amenities, events and the walkable location. The negative experience is concentrated in operations: one 2025 review says quality of life “dropped significantly,” citing broken garage doors, unavailable elevators and amenities, dirty areas, and requests marked complete without repairs; older reviews also report package theft and weak access control.

Published resident feedback includes a faulty AC/heater that was allegedly addressed by leaving the fan and AC running continuously, and a leaky showerhead that maintenance declined to fix. Another review says appliances are “of poor quality and constantly need to be fixed/replaced”; these are isolated written reports rather than a published structural rating.

Residents frequently praise the staff and amenities: one calls the manager “THE ABSOLUTE BEST,” while another says the team is “fast and on top of everything” and the community is kept “quite clean.” The negative reviews describe management as rude or unresponsive, maintenance communication problems, and construction that was “loud all day” with bright lights at night.

Residents describe the building as “beautiful, modern, and well-maintained,” and ApartmentRatings publishes a 4.5/5 maintenance score. The physical-condition evidence is nevertheless mixed: reviewers report monthly elevator failures, a broken garage-access elevator, a trash-chute cover that would not close, and one unresolved leak that left a ceiling “molding.”

The strongest day-to-day positives are the amenities, location and staff: one resident called the concierge team “real gems,” while another said staff were “friendly, professional, and helpful.” The negative experience is concentrated in operations—reviewers describe delayed responses, limited guest parking and rule-enforcement problems, including one resident who said the front office gave “never a straight answer and always a runaround.”

The clearest systems complaint is South-tower elevator service: one resident reported “2 of 4 elevators down,” while another reported “9+ months” with one elevator and periods without any elevator access. Older reviews also mention thin walls, incomplete construction and unsecured garage access; these establish historical complaints, not necessarily conditions still current on October 14, 2026.

Daily-life feedback is polarized: reviewers praise staff as “exceptionally friendly” and describe the amenities and location positively, but South-tower residents report elevators down for extended periods and inadequate repair updates. Other reviews cite an unlocked apartment door, package or garage-security concerns and noise, suggesting a materially uneven experience by tower and issue type.

One resident review describes the homes as “very well-constructed,” while another calls the community “really modern and quiet.” No reviewed source located for this report published recurring complaints about plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems, leaks, waterproofing, lifts or other building-system failures.

Reviews describe the place as “super clean,” “nice and clean,” and “really modern and quiet,” with one calling it a nice place to live. The main operational criticism was an “expensive, complicated process for visitors' parking”; a separate reviewer alleged that management authorized towing legally parked visitor vehicles during Hurricane Milton and wrote, “DO NOT LIVE HERE!”