Residents reported a 24-hour loss of power on a 43-degree day and another review described being without power for “12 hrs and counting”; both accounts also mention fire alarms or power-cut problems. These are operational infrastructure reports rather than a published engineering assessment, and no separate structural rating was found.

Daily-life feedback is mixed: residents praised the location and described staff as helpful, including one saying a representative responded “within a very short period of time.” However, other reviews report “There is no property Manager,” prolonged power loss during extreme heat, fire-alarm concerns and a blocked rubbish chute with the dumpster room locked.

One resident reported that the lift had broken five times within two months of settlement, calling the situation “Terrible!!!” This is a single serious infrastructure report rather than a recurring theme, and no broader published evidence on plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems or waterproofing was found.

The visible reviews include positive comments such as “Extremely professional” and “Very good customer service over the phone, reception & services.” A later resident complained that parties started “after 10pm weekdays and overnight on weekends” and said reports to management were “rubbish”; this is a single review, not a demonstrated recurring management pattern.

no notes returned

The published review set describes a quiet, convenient location, including a review saying the development is “5 minutes” from the station and “15 minutes” to Town Hall by train. The main negative is historical rather than a current building-operations complaint: one reviewer reported a “9 months delay in a 14-month project” and alleged buyers were harmed by Deicorp’s promises; a separate review simply said “good.”