The published reviews contain limited direct infrastructure evidence. Positive reviewers describe apartments as being kept in “very good working order,” while another reports “Terrible plumbing” and “Constant problems for all of us”; later reviews describe repairs to a sink, garbage disposal, blinds and bathroom rumbling, but do not establish a building-wide structural condition.

Residents largely describe a well-run daily experience: reviews say management and maintenance “really care,” the grounds are clean, and staff are “very attentive and cordial.” Recent feedback says the manager makes sure work is done “in a timely manner” and that staff “keep this place immaculate”; the available negative feedback is isolated rather than a recurring operational theme.

Published project material describes 1999 as a new, all-electric, LEED Gold building with fresh-air intake systems, low-flow plumbing fixtures and greywater-ready irrigation. A resident review nevertheless reported that the AC was not working at move-in, with “flickering lights, random power outages,” malfunctioning smoke detectors and a temporarily non-working FOB key.

Most sampled reviews praise the team: one resident called management “incredibly professional” and said maintenance was prompt and the building clean, while other reviewers described staff as “understanding, dedicated and efficient.” Counterevidence includes a complaint that follow-through declined and another alleging staff were rude and discriminatory; the building also has no on-site parking.

no notes returned

The available reviews are mostly positive about day-to-day life: residents describe the apartments as "bright, clean" and praise a "very prompt" maintenance worker, friendly office staff and a sociable community. One 2025 review reports a serious management dispute after a resident's death, alleging the property sought nearly $2,000 through collection letters; this is a single report, not a recurring theme.

Review material praises ongoing upgrades, including “New kitchens, lobby fresh floors and painting,” while the developer reports modernized plumbing, lighting, boilers and air equipment. A serious April 2026 report said the 14-storey building had only one working elevator; management said the freight elevator malfunctioned on March 27 and that repair parts had been ordered.

Published reviews describe staff as friendly and management as responsive: “Friendly and Professional environment. Office staff and Management are responsive and eager to help,” and another says maintenance comes “quickly with a smile.” The main operational concern is the reported elevator outage, while one applicant said “no one ever replied”; these are tempered by repeated praise for security, cleanliness and staff attitude.

Resident and reporting evidence is mostly positive on the physical experience: one resident said the apartment was “very comfortable” and “peaceful,” stayed warm in winter without drafts, and was quiet despite nearby elevated trains. A separate resident reported that the AC was out for “a whole month” and that the apartment became “unbearably hot” on some days; another family said the building’s clean air had quieted a child’s asthma.

Daily-life feedback is mixed: residents and visitors praised the peaceful setting, attractive building, neighborhood and shared outdoor/play spaces, while one resident described management as “horrible” and “very unprofessional.” Other reviews report that calls hang up, letters receive no response, and office staff redirect residents without resolving issues; these are resident-reported complaints rather than independently verified findings.

The available resident feedback contains one systems-related complaint: “The building ac units bring marijuna smell into the apartments,” with the reviewer adding that the bathroom smelled of marijuana every morning. Project information states that the completed building is all-electric and has Passive House and LEED Platinum certifications, but those are design/certification facts rather than resident-condition reviews.

The visible resident feedback is unfavorable: one review said the air-conditioning units brought marijuana smell into the apartments, while another said, “For a crime ridden neighborhood and these prices.....that's a no.” Project materials describe a fitness center, library, courtyard/playground and rooftop space, but the available published resident comments do not provide positive operational feedback about staff, management or upkeep.

Residents reported serious historic fabric and systems problems, including “ceilings…caving in,” inconsistent air conditioning, a “constantly broken” elevator, leaks, mold and water entering the elevator. More recently, a resident said the building went without hot water for nearly three weeks in 2026 and that this was the sixth such episode; management said a circulating pump restored service on May 8, 2026. The older 2018–2019 reports predate the developer’s stated 2023 completion of a major rehabilitation, so their current applicability is uncertain, but the 2026 hot-water reporting shows at least one systems problem persisted within the review window.

The day-to-day accounts are mixed but weighted toward operational complaints: residents described “no maintenance getting done,” feared retaliation, and reported no security and poor cleanliness. There is also positive feedback—one reviewer called the manager “nice respectful” and said staff go “above and beyond,” while another described a “safe environment” and praised the staff.

Older resident reporting described “leaky ceilings,” mold, infestation and discolored tap water, while one resident review alleged, “MY WINDOWS LEAK, I MEAN IT RAINS IN MY APARTMENT!!” Those conditions are not necessarily current: published project materials state that the 2024 rehabilitation added new roofs, windows, plumbing fixtures, HVAC upgrades, electrical-panel upgrades and masonry repairs.

Resident accounts praised the location as “the best place to be for convenience,” but operational feedback was sharply critical: one resident said, “The rules are made up as they go along,” regarding locked basketball courts, and another described the office response as having “an attitude.” The later renovation materials report a new clubhouse, resident-services coordinator, security improvements and tenant-council engagement, but they are project descriptions rather than independent post-completion resident reviews.

Reviewers reported significant system and fabric problems: “the elevators are always down,” “The buzzer never works,” poor electrical work, and pipes that “just burst from being severely cold.” A separate Google review described an apartment leak continuing for weeks, with buckets still catching water; these are resident reports and may predate the developer’s stated 2023 completion of rehabilitation.

Daily-living feedback is strongly negative: one resident said repairs were delayed and a sink stopped up “CONSTANTLY,” while another reported that office staff treated residents poorly. A security reviewer also alleged that a resident controlled keys to shared rooms and that access was restricted early; these comments are published reviews, not a current management statement.