Nam Long develops affordable and market-rate homes, apartments, villas, and integrated townships in Vietnam, serving young and low-income families, owner-occupiers, and investors. Its model combines land development, off-plan sales, commercial property, affordable housing, and construction services for diverse urban communities.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
| Project | Overall | Structure & systems | Management & living |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akari City — Phase 2Bình Tân, Ho Chi Minh City | 8.4/ 10 | 7.0/ 10 | 7.0/ 10 |
The largest published review base is the Akari City Google aggregate at 4.2/5 from 241 reviews, which converts to 7.0/10 under the specified curve. The Phase 2 handover reports and the small Block AK7 sample are positive, but the recurring review themes do not establish a qualifying moderate or severe operational or structural problem, so the anchor is unchanged; structure is scored only from the reported completion and handover-quality evidence. | |||
The October 2024 handover reporting says Phase 2 was completed on schedule and quotes a buyer saying the apartment, corridors, lobby and amenities were “all hoàn thiện chỉn chu” (carefully completed) and that he was very satisfied. Another buyer said construction and handover were on schedule. These are handover-time observations rather than a long-term engineering inspection, and no recurring structural, plumbing, HVAC or leakage complaint was located. | Published reviews describe the setting as green and relaxing, with “all necessary facilities,” and praise “enthusiastic, cute and caring staff” and friendly security. The main lifestyle drawbacks in the review material are that the project is “a bit far to D1” and one reviewer found it “not dog friendly”; these are isolated or low-severity points rather than a demonstrated recurring management failure. | ||
| EHome Southgate — Phase 2An Thạnh, Bến Lức | 8.1/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.5/ 10 |
The only published aggregate located was 4.8/5 from four reviews for Block A5, a cluster-level proxy rather than a clearly labeled Phase 2 aggregate. Because the review base is under ten, the rules require keeping the result within one point of 6.5; the favorable but limited written comments support 7.5, while the single gym-maintenance complaint is not recurring and therefore does not move the score. | |||
The developer’s published resident feedback described the construction quality as a surprise compared with similarly priced projects and praised the modern design and view. It also said windows and ventilation were arranged to improve air circulation; these are dated promotional/testimonial statements, not an independent engineering inspection, and no specific Phase 2 structural failure was found in the reviewed material. | The available resident-facing feedback was mostly positive: one reviewer wrote “Không khí trong lành....”, while another called the block new and fully equipped. The same second comment qualified that praise by saying the gym was small, had few devices, and that the machines had not been maintained for a long time; this is one readable complaint, not a recurring theme. | ||
| Flora NoviaThủ Đức, Ho Chi Minh City | 7.9/ 10 | 7.7/ 10 Nhà Tốt 8.8/10 · 250 reviews · nhatot.com Nhà Tốt publishes 8.8/10 from 250 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.7. | 7.4/ 10 Nhà Tốt 8.5/10 · 250 reviews · nhatot.com Nhà Tốt publishes 8.5/10 from 250 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.4. |
Nhà Tốt’s building-level resident aggregate, published as 8.6/10 from +250 reviews, has the largest review base and converts to 7.9/10. Google provides a lower signal, while reported noise and staff complaints reduce the score and repeated location, amenities and community praise partly offsets them. | |||
Nhà Tốt công bố điểm “Chất lượng xây dựng” 8.8/10 và một cư dân nhận xét “Chất lượng bàn giao của Nam Long tốt”. Tuy vậy, một Google reviewer ghi nhận mặt đường lát đá phía trước đã “xuống cấp”, “chỗ lồi chỗ lỏm”; bằng chứng kết cấu chi tiết còn hạn chế. | Nhà Tốt ghi nhận quản lý & an ninh 8.5/10; cư dân mô tả vị trí đi làm/sân bay nhanh và cộng đồng “trẻ, văn minh”. Mặt trái gồm tiếng ồn từ mặt tiền, hồ bơi đông cuối tuần và phản ánh Google rằng bảo vệ “nói chuyện như ra lệnh”. | ||
| EHome Southgate — Phase 1An Thạnh, Bến Lức | 7.8/ 10 | 7.5/ 10 | 7.5/ 10 |
The Block A5 listing is the only published property-specific aggregate located and reports 4.8/5 from 4 reviews. Its review base is below ten, so the score is kept within one point of the 6.5 low-volume anchor level rather than using the unrestrained conversion; the visible written comments are positive overall but include a gym-size and maintenance criticism. | |||
The available resident feedback is favorable about the physical product: one review says “Không khí trong lành” (“Fresh air”), and the developer-published homeowner account describes “quality construction,” modern design and carefully arranged windows and ventilation. No resident review located reported leaks, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, lift or other structural-system failure; the gym-equipment maintenance complaint is operational rather than a building-systems failure. | The published resident feedback describes a generally pleasant daily environment: “Không khí trong lành” (“Fresh air”), a new block with “đầy đủ tiện ích” (“full amenities”), and the developer-published homeowner account highlights a clubhouse, swimming pool, sports area, coffee area and many trees. The only operational criticism found was that the gym was “hơi nhỏ” (“a bit small”) and its equipment was “lâu rồi không bảo dưỡng” (“had not been maintained for a long time”). | ||
| Akari City — Phase 1Bình Tân, Ho Chi Minh City | 7.3/ 10 | 5.5/ 10 | 7.6/ 10 |
Google’s building-level aggregate of 4.2/5 from 241 reviews sets the anchor, converted to 7.6/10 using the stated curve. A serious 2024 water-quality report warrants a downward adjustment to 7.1 overall; living remains 7.6 because the available review excerpts are predominantly positive, while structure is lower at 5.5 because the water-system evidence is materially adverse but lacks an independent structural rating. | |||
The strongest physical-systems evidence is negative: a November 2024 report said residents at Akari City complained of tea-colored water, and cited a September 2024 Bình Tân District Health Center test reporting that water did not meet the Pseudomonas aeruginosa indicator. Other published material describes modern buildings and facilities, while a project review notes that some 56m² units lack balconies and that Võ Văn Kiệt-facing units may experience dust and noise; there is no independent engineering score. | The published Google excerpts describe a generally positive daily experience: residents/reviewers called the grounds relaxing, the area “CLEAN AND LUXURIOUS,” and staff “enthusiastic, cute and caring,” while another praised “Friendly security!” The same material records “Not dog friendly” and “A bit far to D1”; these are individual limitations rather than evidence of a recurring management failure. | ||
| Flora Mizuki MP1–MP5 — Phase 1Bình Chánh, Ho Chi Minh City | 7.3/ 10 | 4.0/ 10 | 7.0/ 10 |
The largest published aggregate found is 4.4/5 from 9 reviews, so it cannot serve as a normal 10-review anchor; its curve conversion is approximately 8.2, but the rules require a sub-10-review result to remain within one point of 6.5. The resulting 6.2 reflects the reported aggregate together with repeated severe ground-subsidence/repair complaints, while the living component remains higher because several reviews praise amenities, staff, greenery and convenience. No published evidence establishes a defective structural frame, so the structure assessment is limited to reported external ground and access conditions. | |||
Published reporting documented long cracks, broken paving, sunken walkways and uneven entrance steps around MP1–MP2, while residents said MP3–MP5 repairs had begun but were still unfinished. A 2025 place review also described the infrastructure as “hơi sụt lún” and said the entrance sometimes floods at high tide; this is physical-site evidence, not proof that the towers’ structural frames are unsafe. | Residents and place reviewers praise the greenery, parks, gym, pool and helpful security; one family described life as “không khác gì những kỳ nghỉ ở resort,” with services and recreation close at hand. The less positive operational evidence is that residents reported delayed responses to subsidence complaints, a pool under repair despite monthly charges, and a 2025 review saying pets were prohibited and the entrance sometimes flooded. | ||
| EHomeS Nam Sài Gòn — Phase 2, Block CBình Chánh, Ho Chi Minh City | 7.0/ 10 | —/ 10 | 6.3/ 10 |
The building-specific place listing publishes 4.2/5 from six reviews, which is below the 10-review anchor threshold; therefore the score is held within one point of 6.5 rather than treated as a robust aggregate. The visible reviews suggest attractive open surroundings but also one concrete management/service failure, producing a cautious 6.3 overall and living score. No building-specific structural review evidence was found, so structure is null. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | A resident who moved into Block C in June 2025 described the surrounding Mizuki Park space as “rộng, thoáng” (spacious and airy), liked the sports/walking area, fresh air and variety of food options, and rated the experience 4/5. A separate 1/5 review reported that building management took months to issue a lift card and complained about the security guard’s attitude; the small visible sample means the current day-to-day picture remains uncertain. | ||
| Flora PanoramaBình Chánh, Ho Chi Minh City | 4.4/ 10 | 2.4/ 10 | 2.4/ 10 |
The Google Reviews/Maps aggregate of 2.8/5 from 14 reviews sets the level; using the stated conversion curve, that is approximately 3.4/10 before commentary adjustment. Repeated power-outage reports and repeated poor-management complaints materially worsen both the physical-systems and day-to-day living evidence, producing a 2.4/10 overall score; the available evidence does not justify separating structure and living quality. | |||
The published resident feedback contains repeated infrastructure complaints: “Constantly power outages,” “Unscheduled power cut,” and “Constant scheduled and unscheduled power cuts.” One longer review also reports no air conditioning or hot water at handover and says the Chinese locks and kitchen equipment were not regarded as quality-brand products; these are resident reports, not an independent engineering inspection. | Daily-life feedback is sharply mixed but leans negative: two reviews say “Very bad management” or “Bad management,” while another says “very good apartment” and a resident praises the “facade” and “view.” A local review article also flags the management fee as high and says some outside conveniences are distant, while project coverage describes gym, yoga, children’s play areas, lounge and clubhouse facilities. |
Address: 19th Floor, CharmVit Tower, 117 Tran Duy Hung Street, Cau Giay District, Hanoi City
Address: Nam Long Residential Area, Cai Rang Ward, Can Tho City
Strategic joint-venture partner in residential and infrastructure development in Vietnam.
Strategic joint-venture partner in residential and infrastructure development in Vietnam.
Joined the Izumi City project as a Japanese investment partner in 2025.
Cooperated through Southgate to implement the 165-hectare Waterpoint New Urban Area project.
Cooperated through Southgate to implement the 165-hectare Waterpoint New Urban Area project.
Cooperated through Southgate to implement the 165-hectare Waterpoint New Urban Area project.
Provided the banking relationship referenced in Nam Long's disclosed guarantee for a Nam Long Land loan.
strategic partnership with Hankyu Hanshin Properties Corporation and Nishi-Nippon Railroad
strategic partnership with Hankyu Hanshin Properties Corporation and Nishi-Nippon Railroad (Nishitetsu)
We also welcomed Tokyu Corporation into the Izumi City project
cooperation between Nam Long Investment Joint Stock Company, Japanese partner (Southgate Urban Development Co., Ltd.)
Thai Binh Investment Joint Stock Company (“TBS”) and Tan Hiep Investment Co., Ltd.
Thai Binh Investment Joint Stock Company (“TBS”) and Tan Hiep Investment Co., Ltd.
Guarantee for the loan of Nam Long Land at Vietinbank
| COMPANY NUMBER | 0301438936 Ho Chi Minh City Department of Planning and Investment · VN · Effective 08/10/2025 |
| Vietnam | active 0 projects tracked |
| Residential, for sale | 9 of 10 |
| Residential, for rent | 1 of 10 |
HCMC University of Architecture
In 1983, he graduated from HCMC University of Architecture, majoring in Architecture.
Nguyen Xuan Quang
Southern Institute of Planning / State Committee of General Construction
Mr. Nguyen Xuan Quang Chairman of the BOD
From 1992 up to now, Nguyen Xuan Quang has held the position of Chairman of Nam Long Group.
In 1992, Nguyen Xuan Quang established Nam Long Limited Company, one of the first State-owned companies in the Construction industry in Vietnam.
In the 90s, Nguyen Xuan Quang, Chairman of Nam Long Investment Joint Stock Company (HoSE: NLG), founded Nam Long as a playground for the architects.
Mr. Nguyen Xuan Quang Chairman of the BOD
Tran Thanh Phong
Mr. Tran Thanh Phong Vice Chairman of the BOD
Tran Thanh Phong, Vice Chairman with more than 27 years of experience in construction and real estate development
Tran Thanh Phong, Vice Chairman with more than 27 years of experience in construction and real estate development
Mr. Tran Thanh Phong Vice Chairman of the BOD
Oklahoma City University
Thạc sĩ Quản trị Kinh doanh tại Đại học Oklahoma City
Lucas Ignatius Loh Jen Yuh
Before joining Nam Long Group, Mr. Lucas Ignatius Loh Jen Yuh had over 30 years of working experience within leading Organizations/Corporations in Asia such as the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), Temasek Holdings (a global investment group owned by the Singapore government), Hopson Development Holdings Limited, and CapitaLand Group.
He will continue to serve Nam Long as a Member of the Board of Directors.
Before joining Nam Long Group, Mr. Lucas Ignatius Loh Jen Yuh had over 30 years of working experience within leading Organizations/Corporations in Asia such as the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), Temasek Holdings, Hopson Development Holdings Limited, and CapitaLand Group.
30+ yrs Asia leadership, ex-CapitaLand, ex-Temasek, MBA
He will continue to serve Nam Long as a Member of the Board of Directors.
University of California
Đại học California - Kỹ sư Xây dựng
Cao Tan Thach
Mr. Cao Tan Thach Executive BOD Member
He has ... more than 15 years of experience in the field of project management and development real estate.
Civil engineer, 15+ yrs project development
Mr. Cao Tan Thach Executive BOD Member
Nguyen Thanh Huong
Throughout her career, she has held various senior leadership positions ... at leading enterprises such as Vingroup, Sovico Group, SSI, and HSBC
Ms. Nguyen Thanh Huong Acting Group Chief Executive Officer cum Group Chief Investment Officer
The Group also announces the appointment of Mrs. Nguyen Thanh Huong as Acting Group Chief Executive Officer, effective July 28, 2026.
Mrs. Nguyen Thanh Huong is a senior executive with over 30 years of experience in investment, finance, and real estate. In this role, she will assume responsibility for the management and operation of the Group.
Acting Group CEO, 30+ yrs investment/finance/real estate, ex-Vingroup, ex-Sovico, ex-SSI, ex-HSBC
Ms. Nguyen Thanh Huong Acting Group Chief Executive Officer cum Group Chief Investment Officer
Sunway University, Malaysia
Ông Eric Chan tốt nghiệp Đại học Sunway, Malaysia
Chan Hong Wai
He has made significant impacts in his role as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at SPG Land Real Estate Development, Chief Financial Officer at Novaland Group (2015-2017), Chief Financial Officer at Masan Group (2010-2015).
Mr. Chan Hong Wai Group Chief Financial Officer
Date of appointment: 16/09/2024
He has over 20 years of experience in the field of Finance and Accounting, including 15 years of senior management positions in large companies such as: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at SPG Land Real Estate Development, Deputy Chief Executive Officer dual Chief Financial Officer at Novaland Group, Chief Financial Officer at Masan Group.
CFO, 20+ yrs finance and accounting, ex-Masan, ex-Novaland
Mr. Chan Hong Wai Group Chief Financial Officer
0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.
| Project | Location | Type | Units | Floors | Area | Cost | Payment plan | Launched | Construction start | Original target | Handover | Delay | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHomeS Nam Long II Central Lake — completed 919-apartment tranche | Cần Thơ Cái Răng | residential for sale | 9191 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Mar 2024 | Sep 2025 | +18.0 mo (+18.0 to +18.0) | estimated | completed |
| EHomeS Nam Sài Gòn — Phase 2, Block C | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Chánh | residential for rent | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | tháng 4 2023 | Jan 2024 – Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 – Dec 2025 | +12.0 mo (+1.0 to +23.0) | sourced | completed |
| Akari City — Phase 2 | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Tân | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 50% payment in 30 months until handover1 | 2022 | 2022 | — | Oct 2024 | — | not scorable | completed |
| Flora Panorama | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Chánh | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 30%/GTCH đến khi nhận nhà1 | 2022 | 16/04/2022 | Oct 2023 – Dec 2023 | Jan 2024 | +2.0 mo (+1.0 to +3.0) | estimated | completed |
| EHome Southgate — Phase 2 | Bến Lức An Thạnh | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 10%/5%/5%/5%/25%/45%/5%1 | 2022 | tháng 6 năm 2022 | Jul 2023 | Jan 2023 – Dec 2023 | −0.5 mo (−6.0 to +5.0) | sourced | completed |
| Flora Mizuki MP6–MP8 | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Chánh | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 50%1 | 2021 | June 2021 | Jan 2023 | Dec 2022 | −1.0 mo (−1.0 to −1.0) | estimated | completed |
| Flora Mizuki MP1–MP5 — Phase 1 | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Chánh | residential for sale | — | 20 | — | — | Đặt cọc 50–200tr; 97% giá trị căn hộ + tiền chênh lệch; 5% còn lại1 | 2017 | December 2017 | Sep 2019 – Dec 2019 | Jun 2022 | +31.5 mo (+30.0 to +33.0) | estimated | completed |
| EHome Southgate — Phase 1 | Bến Lức An Thạnh | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 10% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 50% + 5%1 | 2021 | tháng 1 2021 | — | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | — | not scorable | completed |
| Akari City — Phase 1 | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Tân | residential for sale | — | — | — | — | 10% / 10% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 45% + 2% KPBT / 5%1 | 2019 | September 10, 2019 | Jul 2021 – Sep 2021 | Sep 2021 – Dec 2021 | +2.5 mo (0.0 to +5.0) | sourced | completed |
| Flora Novia | Ho Chi Minh City Thủ Đức | residential for sale | — | 18 | — | — | 10% (Bao gồm tiền đặt cọc), 10%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 25%, 5%1 | — | — | Jan 2019 – Dec 2019 | Mar 2020 | +8.5 mo (+3.0 to +14.0) | sourced | completed |
| Auditor | Ernst & Young Vietnam Co., Ltd |
| FiinRatings | A- stable outlook · 25/04/2024 |
| Coverage | active |
| Tracked since | October 11, 2026 |
| Last checked | October 12, 2026 this month |
| Profile last researched | October 12, 2026 |
| Claim |