no notes returned

Published reviews are strongly positive about daily life: one resident says the building is “always extremely clean,” maintenance requests are handled “on the same day,” and front-desk, security and service staff go “above and beyond.” Reviewers also describe the amenities as “5-star hotel meets private club vibes,” although an Apple Maps reviewer said the only thing that might deter a move is that the cost is high.

No resident rating specifically isolates structure, plumbing, HVAC or electrical systems. The building's resident welcome packet reproduces inspection notices citing failures to maintain electric-elevator equipment in safe and sound working condition, including missing emergency-power, communication and fire-service features; these are inspection/code observations, not resident reviews, and the packet does not establish whether they remained unresolved as of October 12, 2026.

The positive reviews repeatedly praise staff—one resident called them “SO kind and helpful”—and describe the building as “consistently very clean,” with maintenance handled “pretty quick.” The counterevidence is meaningful: one resident reported “relentless” train noise, broken spa amenities and questionable move-out charges, while a current news report dated October 5, 2026 documented about 30 vehicle break-ins and a resident asking for “a camera or lighting.”

Residents describe strong physical finishes and sound insulation: one review says, “The walls are so thick and sturdy and the sound proofing is so impressive.” Counterevidence includes an AC failure that persisted for two weeks, reports that “the elevators were broken for months,” and complaints about broken refrigerators, sliding doors and poor cross-ventilation.

Day-to-day feedback is polarized. Positive reviews call the amenities “top notch,” say common areas are “fully cleaned and reset,” and describe staff as “genuinely kind and welcoming”; negative reviews allege management took weeks to respond, failed to address a dog-bite incident, and mishandled parking, packages and deposits.

Positive reviews describe the buildings as “modern, clean and well maintained,” and one resident called the in-unit security “top notch.” Countervailing infrastructure feedback reports that the Boren trash chute repeatedly stayed broken for “a few weeks to 2 months,” one of four elevators was “always broken once a month,” and a P5 garage door had not been fixed during the resident’s entire stay.

Day-to-day reviews frequently praise the staff: one resident said concierge staff were “always friendly and helpful,” while another said guest services went above and beyond to recover a misplaced package. However, a November 2024 Google review alleges unlocked doors and elevators, an absent front desk, poor responses to security reports, and pool areas “overrun by loud parties”; these are serious individual allegations and should not be treated as independently verified facts.

no notes returned

The displayed reviews are mostly positive about daily-life facilities: one reviewer said the gym, pool and common areas were “thoughtfully maintained,” while another praised the “pool, steam, sauna, sun deck and gym.” A separate review reported that the project “Keeps delaying for many years!!,” but this is an older pre-completion complaint and does not establish a current operating condition as of October 12, 2026.

Written reviews include both positive and negative physical observations. One reviewer described “beautiful, high-quality finishes,” while another reported “thin as paper” walls, a cracked countertop and faulty closet hardware; a separate review reported no A/C, heat severe enough to require a hotel stay, and noise/vibration from construction and large grocery-store fans.

Daily-life feedback is mixed. Residents praised staff as “always friendly,” said the caretaker was “professional and quick to reply,” and highlighted the gym, underground parking and Save-On Foods; however, others described threatening entry notices, limited visitor parking and concern that guests would have to pay after 90 minutes. One review also called security an ongoing issue because entry doors and gates did not close.

Published feedback includes a serious October 19, 2024 parkade flood that inundated the building’s electrical vault; the developer’s crews pumped water and restored electricity in almost two days. Resident reviews also report “cracks in roof and walls,” “poor sound proofing,” poor craftsmanship and unresolved cabinet, lock and outlet deficiencies. These are reported observations rather than an independent engineering finding, and the long-term remediation position remains uncertain in the material reviewed.

The lifestyle positives are substantial amenities and the location beside Gilmore Station; one published review called them “Great amenities,” while the Tower 1 review summary praises pools, sports courts, gym equipment and lounges. The negative operational feedback is more consistent: residents describe management as taking “zero responsibility,” ignored deficiency requests and poor parking/service, while the flood report records almost two days to restore electricity after the parkade event.

The published resident feedback includes one serious early-occupancy report of “Ceiling leaks. Hot water turns off,” along with a complaint that the building was “already falling apart.” A more favorable resident described elevator and door issues and cracks as normal for a new building, so the structural evidence is conflicting and largely based on older 2022 reports rather than a current engineering assessment.

Residents praise the location and amenities—one said it was a “great location” and “very well run building,” while another called it “very clean” and said the concierge was friendly. The negative reviews describe the “worst concierge service,” limited desk coverage and unanswered calls; these complaints are dated mainly 2022–2024, so they establish reported past experience but do not prove that the same conditions still applied on October 12, 2026.