no notes returned

Resident reviews consistently praise the operating experience: staff are described as “warm, welcoming, and full of positive energy,” while another says the concierge and doormen were “kind, patient, and efficient.” The main counterpoint in the published review synthesis is that several residents reported “long waits and unavailable elevators,” and one resident reported problems with the sauna, steam room and other shared areas.

Resident feedback describes the building as “beautiful and well-maintained,” and one resident reported that maintenance handled a “minor hot water issue due to the newness of the building and unused pipes.” A housing-data page reported zero HPD violations, zero open violations and zero complaints in the 12 months to October 6, 2026; this is administrative condition data rather than a resident rating.

The written reviews are overwhelmingly positive about day-to-day life: residents describe staff as “professional, courteous, and reliable,” say management is “pretty responsive overall,” and praise a front-desk employee whose customer service was “truly 10/10.” Reviews also call the building clean, safe and welcoming, while praising the amenities and study booths; no recurring operational complaint was found in the written material read.

Resident reports describe the building as unusually quiet and well insulated: one said it was “quieter than the house I grew up in a block from a highway,” while another called the soundproofing “much better than your usual cheap modern ‘luxury’ rentals.” Review summaries also say the building is well maintained and repairs are handled efficiently; the one physical criticism was a wish to update the elevator paneling.

Daily-life feedback is strongly favorable: residents call the team “world class,” describe staff as “friendly, attentive, and quick to help,” and say the building feels “clean, well-maintained, and safe.” The principal adverse report says a departing resident still had not received a security deposit and that management did not answer calls or emails; this is a single report rather than an established recurring pattern.

Resident-review summaries rate maintenance 5.0/5 from 11 reviews and building quality 4.8/5 from 6 reviews, citing quick repairs involving plumbing, electrical work and routine maintenance. The contrary detailed review reports “two separate building-wide water outage incidents” lasting about two days each and says “very very thin walls” allow substantial bridge and hallway noise; these are resident reports, not a current engineering assessment.

The strongest day-to-day feedback praises the staff: one review calls the doormen “so kind and attentive,” and another describes the concierge’s kindness as “unmatched.” The negative evidence is concentrated in management and noise: a resident says management “takes a while to respond,” while the review summary says some residents had difficulty reaching management about billing and security deposits.

no notes returned

The published reviews are visitor/event feedback rather than residential tenant reviews. They describe an “excellent event venue with brilliant layout,” a space that is “nice and cleaned,” and a place for meetings and events where “Peter is great to work with.”

Residents commonly praise prompt repairs: one wrote, “My maintenance request was handled quickly and professionally,” while another described maintenance as “Punctual, fast and efficient.” The physical complaints include poor air circulation and smoke entering apartments, water-pressure and intercom problems, climate-control concerns, and one reported leak where “water [was] coming from my ceiling light”; the Openigloo page reports no open violations and no bedbug history.

Day-to-day reviews are strongly positive about frontline staff: a resident said Amir and Jason were “always so approachable and quick to respond,” and Openigloo reports “friendly doormen” and generally clean amenity spaces. The main lifestyle drawbacks are inconsistent management communication, amenity equipment being out of service or inaccessible, hallway noise, and smoke intrusion; one Google review says the building is “full of smokers” despite being non-smoking.