Artificial Intelligence
Builders Company
Developers/Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.
TG
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.Istanbul, Türkiye · 1 active markets
PRIVATE

Tahincioğlu develops premium residences, offices, retail and mixed-use projects, shopping centres, and luxury hotels in Türkiye, primarily Istanbul, Ankara and resort locations. It serves homebuyers, office users, retailers, investors and hotel guests through development, construction and marketing activities delivered locally.

LinkedIn headcount
271
employees, as shown on LinkedIn · 2026-03-18 · size band 1,001–5,000
Portfolio value
TRY 12.5 billion
2023
Total projects
over 30 completed and ongoing projects
across the company’s whole history
Units delivered
362 offices
as the company states it
Projects last researched October 9, 2026
Every figure on this card was read out of a document.

Overview

Investor tear sheet

a summary of the tabs that follow · no rating of our own

Company dossier

Legal name
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul Yatırım ve İnşaat A.Ş.1
Headquarters
Kardelen Street No: 2 Floor: 411, Istanbul1, Türkiye
Founded
not published
Entity type
PRIVATE1
Business model
offplan for sale1, commercial1, mixed use1, contracting1
Markets
1 market listed
What they build
Mixed use (8 of 10) · Residential, for sale (2 of 10)
Full dossier in About →

Delivery record

7 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
0.0 mo
the middle of 7 scored projects
Average delay
+3.4 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
3.8 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+24.0 mo
Nidapark Ayyıldız · +13.0 to +35.0
6
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
0
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
1
red rows below

Against other developers

7 date-assessed here · 31 developers, 82 date-assessed projects in Türkiye
Median delay
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
0.0 mo vs +6.0 mo
this developer 6.0 mo better
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
+3.4 mo vs +9.8 mo
this developer 6.4 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
86% vs 50%
this developer 36 pts better
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
3.8 yrs vs 3.9 yrs
this developer 0.1 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 61 in the market.
Projects and timelines in Track Record →

Resident experience

9 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
7.5/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
6.4/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.2/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 9 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 34 developers, 113 rated buildings in Türkiye
Overall rating
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
7.5 vs 7.3
this developer 0.2 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 113 in the market.
Structure & systems
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
6.4 vs 6.6
this developer 0.2 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 51 in the market.
Management & living
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
7.2 vs 7.1
this developer 0.1 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 110 in the market.
The market here is Türkiye: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.
Ratings by building →

Awards & recognition

All awards →

Risks & source coverage

  • DELIVERY DELAY Reported 25 August 2025; contractual delivery date June 2024; reported company indication of possible completion by end-2026 (future commitment, not verified completion). A buyer alleged that the Nidapark Küçükyalı Büyükada B10 apartment, contracted for delivery in June 2024, remained undelivered 14 months later; the buyer said the company reported a possible delay until the end of 2026 and offered no compensation. This is a buyer allegation reported in August 2025, and the source does not establish whether delivery occurred by the research date.
  • DELIVERY DELAY Reported 13 January 2025; alleged contractual/completion date June 2024. A buyer alleged that the Nidapark Küçükyalı Büyükada project was still only at foundation stage in January 2025 despite a June 2024 completion date, and said Tahincioğlu and Emlak Konut did not provide an explanation. The report is an unverified customer complaint rather than an adjudicated finding.
  • RISK Reported 27 September 2023; alleged handover approximately 5 May 2023. A buyer alleged that Nidakule Kayaşehir offices were handed over in May 2023 without electricity, water or an occupancy permit (iskan), while common charges were being collected; no resolution or company response is documented on the retrieved page.
  • 2 more in Risk & Sources
Record status
active
Company sources
107 source entries across 107 fields
Projects tracked
10 · 10 completed in assessment
All flags and sources →

Track Record

Delivery record

7 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
0.0 mo
the middle of 7 scored projects
Average delay
+3.4 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
3.8 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+24.0 mo
Nidapark Ayyıldız · +13.0 to +35.0
6
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
0
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
1
red rows below

Against other developers

7 date-assessed here · 31 developers, 82 date-assessed projects in Türkiye
Median delay
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
0.0 mo vs +6.0 mo
this developer 6.0 mo better
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
+3.4 mo vs +9.8 mo
this developer 6.4 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
86% vs 50%
this developer 36 pts better
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.·31 developers in Türkiye
3.8 yrs vs 3.9 yrs
this developer 0.1 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 61 in the market.
The market here is Türkiye: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because planning regimes and reporting norms move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a size band. Read the two delay figures together. A median close to the market with a much better average means no single disaster; the reverse means one project is carrying the record. Time to deliver runs from the earliest start we hold to the completion itself — a construction start where a source gave one, otherwise a sales launch, otherwise the launch year read as its January. A handover the sources place only inside a year is read as that December, so a duration is the widest the record allows rather than the flattering end of it. Only delivered projects dated at both ends count, so it is taken over fewer projects than the delay figures, and a long build is not a fault: a tower is not a villa run. Sourced figures only, both sides, and values taken from documents held on file are excluded here — a developer who shares their records should not score better than one who does not.

Construction start to handover

10 of 10 projects dated · 1 place
Based on covered projects with documented construction or launch dates and available handover dates. Timelines vary by project and may not represent the developer’s full portfolio.
Construction start, or the launchTarget completion (window)Completion or handover, as reportedCurrently statedLaunch year only, no date publishedEarly or ≤6 mo lateOver 6–12 mo lateOver 12 mo lateStalled
Istanbul, Türkiye
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027todayISTANBUL, TÜRKIYE+24 moverifieddates under reviewdates under reviewdates under reviewon timeverifiedon timeverifiedon timeverifiedon timeverifiedon timeverifiedon timeverified
Click a row in the chart to open a project, or a table row below to see its sources. The chart runs wider than the page where the record spans many years — scroll it sideways to follow a project to its handover. Every date we have is drawn. A hollow marker is only a launch year, not a date anyone published. No dates published means we looked and found none; dates not yet checked means we have not looked yet. Handing over is not finished — rows say which. A delay is shown when one source gives the promised date and another gives the real one, however rough: "2019" still counts, and the row shows how wide that is. Projects missing one of the two dates, or with sources that disagree, are left out of the figures. 2 turned out to be about something else — a phase, a neighbour, the wider masterplan — and are marked off-subject.

Building & Livability Ratings

Resident experience

9 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
7.5/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
6.4/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.2/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 9 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 34 developers, 113 rated buildings in Türkiye
Overall rating
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
7.5 vs 7.3
this developer 0.2 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 113 in the market.
Structure & systems
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
6.4 vs 6.6
this developer 0.2 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 51 in the market.
Management & living
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş. · 34 other developers in Türkiye
7.2 vs 7.1
this developer 0.1 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 110 in the market.
The market here is Türkiye: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.

By building

9 rated · 1 not rated · scale 1–10
ProjectOverallStructure & systemsManagement & living
Nidapark SeyrantepeSeyrantepe, Istanbul368 units
9.0/ 10
—/ 10
9.0/ 10

The Google Reviews/Maps building aggregate of 4.6/5 from 48 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.8/10 under the stated curve. The published comments are mostly positive and add a small commentary uplift for repeated praise of facilities and location; no structure score is assigned because no resident structural rating or substantive physical-condition review was published in the material read.

+ amenity-rich+ good access+ central location+ family facilities+ positive resident experience
− technical-service complaint− height complaint− limited building-height preference− isolated service criticism
Not found in sources: limited operational evidence

no notes returned

no links returned

Published reviews describe a generally strong day-to-day experience, highlighting the “kapalı ve açık çocuk parkı,” football pitch, indoor pool and nearby everyday services, while another reviewer called it “one of the best places to live in istanbul” and praised its facilities and access. The main operational criticism in the material read was the short review “Teknik servis sıfır.”; this is an isolated complaint rather than a recurring theme in the eight reviews read.

Nidapark Küçükyalı MahalleKüçükyalı, Istanbul
8.2/ 10
—/ 10
7.5/ 10

Google Reviews/Maps’te bina için yayımlanan tek aggregate 5/5’tir ancak yalnızca 4 yoruma dayanır; bu nedenle 5/5’in doğrudan 10.0 karşılığı kullanılmayıp, kural gereği 6.5’in bir puan çevresinde 7.5 olarak tutuldu. Okunan iki yazılı yorum da olumludur ve güvenlik ile genel memnuniyeti destekler, fakat yapısal sistemler hakkında yayımlanmış inceleme kanıtı yoktur.

+ Yardımcı dış güvenlik+ Olumlu genel izlenim+ Az katlı yatay mimari+ Kapalı otopark+ Fitness ve yürüyüş olanakları
− Yayınlanmış tekrar eden şikâyet yok− Yönetim performansı hakkında sınırlı veri− Bakım gecikmesi kanıtı yok− Altyapı şikâyeti kanıtı yok− Gürültü veya temizlik şikâyeti kanıtı yok

no notes returned

no links returned

Okunan Google yorumlarında günlük yaşam tonu olumludur: bir kullanıcı “Çok güzel gene gelicem” derken, başka bir kullanıcı dış güvenlik ekibinin “her türlü yardımcı” olduğunu yazmıştır. Bununla birlikte yalnızca dört puan ve iki okunabilir yazılı yorum bulunduğundan yönetim, temizlik ve olanaklar hakkında güncel kanıt sınırlıdır; kapalı otopark, fitness, peyzaj ve yürüyüş/koşu yolları ise geliştiricinin proje tanımında yer alan özelliklerdir.

Nidapark AyyıldızKağıthane, Istanbul95 units
8.0/ 10
5.5/ 10
8.0/ 10

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base found: 4.5/5 from 21 reviews, converting to 8.5 under the specified curve. A separately published resident complaint alleges prolonged water ingress, mould and unsuccessful repairs, so the overall score is reduced to 8.0; the structural score is lower because that is the only direct physical-condition evidence. The evidence is limited: Yandex publishes 4.0/5 but no review count, and the complaint is a single report rather than proof of a building-wide pattern.

+ Low-rise design+ Modern architecture+ Open/spacious layout+ Pool and parking facilities
− Water ingress− Mould reported− Wall deterioration− Roof leakage alleged− Warranty resolution delay
Not found in sources: No other structural failure reported
+ Metro proximity+ Cleanliness praise+ Upscale feel+ Convenient central location+ Residential quality praised
− Limited social life− Surrounding construction concern− Perceived isolated setting− Management responsiveness concern− Evidence base is small

The published resident complaint alleges water entering through apartment walls since November 2021, with the child’s room deteriorating and developing mould; it says similar leakage exists in the roof and other apartments. The same report says two plaster repairs did not solve the problem and that management repeatedly delayed a permanent remedy. This is one serious resident report, not a verified engineering assessment or a recurring multi-review pattern.

The place listing publishes 4.5/5 from 21 reviews, with comments including “Tertemiz, elit, lüks” and “Metro istasyonunun yanında süper bir lokasyon.” The same sample includes criticism that there is “sosyal hayat yok” and that surrounding construction is negative, while a separate October 2025 complaint says repeated calls, emails and WhatsApp messages produced only delay rather than a permanent repair.

Nidapark İstinye Panoramaİstinye, Istanbul217 units
7.4/ 10
—/ 10
6.5/ 10

Yandex Maps’ın bina için yayımladığı tek resident yorumu 5/5’tir; ancak 10 yorum eşiğine ulaşılmadığı için kurallar gereği puan 6.5 civarında tutuldu. Yapısal koşullar hakkında bağımsız yayımlanmış review puanı veya şikâyet kanıtı bulunmadığından structure skoru verilmedi; tek olumlu yorum recurring theme oluşturacak kadar çoklu değildir.

+ olumlu site izlenimi+ kapalı/açık havuz+ fitness salonu+ 7/24 CCTV izleme+ yürüyüş ve oyun alanları

no notes returned

no links returned

Yandex Maps’teki tek bina yorumu “Güzel bir site 5 yıldız” şeklindedir; bu, sınırlı da olsa olumlu bir günlük yaşam izlenimi verir. Geliştiricinin yaşam rehberi kapalı/açık havuz, fitness, sauna, buhar odası, pilates, oyun ve yürüyüş alanlarını; ayrıca 7/24 CCTV izlemeyi listeler, ancak bunlar kullanıcı puanı değil proje dokümantasyonudur.

Nidapark Küçükyalı SedefKüçükyalı, Istanbul
7.3/ 10
—/ 10
6.8/ 10

The 4.1/5 aggregate from 28 reviews is the anchor and converts to approximately 7.3/10 under the requested market curve. The written material points to a weaker day-to-day living experience—especially noise, management responsiveness, charges and amenity limitations—so living is assessed at 6.8, but there is no published building-specific structure rating to score independently. The evidence includes current-looking reviews through January 2026, but it does not establish that every reported condition remained unchanged on 2026-10-09.

+ Acceptable apartment quality+ Balconies+ Outdoor pool+ Fitness provision+ Planned social facilities
− Drain odour− Bad-smelling water− Wall seepage− Construction dust− Incomplete amenity areas
+ Security+ Metro proximity+ Pool+ Fitness and social facilities+ Nearby retail and services
− Management non-response− Construction and ventilation noise− Dust and dirt− High service charges− Some amenities closed or limited

One resident reports that in windy and rainy weather the apartment fills with drain odour, the water smells and the walls leak: “Gider problemini gideremiyorlar… Ayrıca duvarları da akıyor.” Another review says construction dust and dirt were severe enough that residents could “neredeyse” not use the pool. These are resident observations rather than an independent engineering inspection, and no building-specific structure sub-score was published.

The building is described as secure and conveniently located, with the official project page listing an outdoor pool, fitness room, cafeteria and social facilities; one resident simply wrote “Perfect place for living.” Countervailing feedback says “genel yönetimden dönen bile yok,” reports persistent construction and shop-ventilation noise, and says dust and dirt made pool use difficult; another review calls the gym small and cleaning weak.

Nidapark BaşakşehirBaşakşehir, Istanbul374 units
7.2/ 10
—/ 10
6.8/ 10

Google’s 4/5 rating from 158 reviews is the largest review base and converts to 7.0 under the specified curve. The Yandex result is directionally similar at 4.2/5 from 19 ratings, while the recurring management criticism warrants a modest downward adjustment; no published structural rating or reliable structural review evidence was found.

+ Generally positive resident experience+ Pleasant living environment+ High-quality residence+ Good compound+ Family-friendly setting
− Management dissatisfaction− Visitor parking limitation− Follow-up needed− Mixed operational feedback− Recent negative management reports

no notes returned

no links returned

Published reviews describe Nidapark Başakşehir as “High quality residence,” “a lovely place to live in,” and generally a good compound. The main operational concern is management: two Google reviews say “Bad management” and “Very bad management”; another says the site is good generally but “need some follow up.”

Nidapark Küçükyalı KınalıKüçükyalı, Istanbul
7.1/ 10
7.0/ 10
7.1/ 10

Google’s 4.2/5 rating from 142 reviews is the largest review base and sets the level at a 7.6 converted anchor. Placera’s smaller rating and the reported complaints pull the score down, while repeated praise offsets part of that movement.

+ Perceived structural solidity+ Wide apartments+ Underfloor heating+ Insulation and glazing listed+ Covered parking and generator
− Rainwater entering walls− Persistent drain odour− Bad-smelling water− Interior overheating− Wind-related door damage
+ Good E-5/metro access+ Sea/island views+ Large apartments+ Perceived quality+ On-site fitness/pool/social facilities
− Theft allegation− Management non-response− Delayed works− Crowded layout− Green-area and construction complaints

Physical-condition feedback is mixed. One resident wrote that “her yağmur sonrası duvarım akıyor” despite repeated inspections, while another reported drain odour, bad-smelling water and leaking walls; a separate review says, “Bina içi neden bu kadar sıcak.” These are reviewer reports, not an engineering inspection.

Reviewers praise the location, views and general quality, calling it “İyi bir site” and “Kaliteli.” The operational picture is uneven: one resident alleges thefts and management concealment, another says “yönetim de çarem olamıyor,” and Placera includes the comment “her şeyi erteliyorlar.”

Nidapark Küçükyalı BurgazKüçükyalı, Istanbul
6.7/ 10
6.5/ 10
7.0/ 10

Yandex Maps provides the largest qualifying review base at 4.2/5 from 31 ratings, which converts to 7.0 under the specified curve. The score is moderated to 6.7 because the written evidence includes a serious leak/drain-odour/insect report and recurring complaints about dues and dust, while repeated praise for views, cleanliness, comfort and shared facilities offsets part of that reduction.

+ Modern building+ Sea/island views+ Good shared facilities+ Pool infrastructure+ Secure residential site
− Drain odour− Wall leaks− Insect ingress− Construction dust− Unresolved defects
+ Island views+ Swimming pool+ Clean shared areas+ Comfortable service+ Fitness and leisure facilities
− High dues− Dust on balconies− Dust affecting pool− Weak gym provision− Management unable to resolve complaint

Published resident feedback includes a serious infrastructure complaint: one reviewer says rain and wind fill the home with drain odour, walls leak and insects enter through construction openings, adding that management could not resolve the problem. Other published descriptions identify modern buildings, pools and shared facilities, but they are marketing or listing descriptions rather than independent engineering inspections; no verified structural score was published.

The daily-life picture is mixed. Reviewers praise the site as “clean and beautiful” with “comfort, service” and highlight the island view and pool, while another says the gym is “very bad” for the dues charged and a resident reports that management could not solve odour, leakage and insect problems; an additional review says dust from the adjacent concrete plant affects balconies and the pool.

Nidapark KayaşehirKayaşehir, Istanbul
6.4/ 10
6.5/ 10
6.3/ 10

The 3.84/5 building aggregate based on 100 reviews converts to an anchor of 6.5/10 and is the only published building-level aggregate located. Repeated complaints about delayed delivery, weak management and security reduce the resident-experience result slightly, while repeated praise for workmanship, cleanliness, amenities and quietness limits the reduction; the evidence is largely from older reviews, so current conditions remain uncertain.

+ Quality interior materials+ Good workmanship+ Clean site+ Well-maintained grounds+ Functional residential design
− Balcony changes or omissions− Perceived rushed workmanship− Small apartment dimensions− Construction-phase uncertainty in older reviews
Not found in sources: No published engineering-condition report
+ Quiet and peaceful setting+ Clean common areas+ Strong social amenities+ Family-friendly environment+ Accessible to transport and services
− Delayed handover history− Poor site-management reports− Inexperienced security staff− High dues− Limited or missing convenience retail

The published reviews contain some positive physical-condition feedback: “İşçilik ve kullanılan malzeme oldukça kaliteli” and “Kullanılan iç malzemeler kaliteli.” Negative comments focus on balcony design or promised balcony doors being changed, with one reviewer saying “Oda balkonları olacak dediler... şimdi yapmıcaz diyolar”; the sources do not publish a formal assessment of the framework, plumbing, HVAC or electrical systems.

Daily-life feedback is divided. Positive reviewers describe a “sakin ve huzurlu” place, a “düzenli ve bakımlı” site and “kaliteli ve sosyal donatilari yuksek” facilities, while negative reviews say “Site yönetimi işini yapamıyor sadece para alıyor” and report problematic entrances and inexperienced security staff.

Only buildings that have reached handover are rated. 1 of 10 projects carries no rating: a building still under construction is never asked about, one that has just been handed over may not have been reached yet, and the rest were asked about and no published resident commentary was found. Structure is fixed at handover and stays the developer's; management and living belongs to whoever runs the building now. The overall verdict weights both rather than averaging them. None of this is checked: a rating is what people published about a building, aggregated — it is not evidence, it cannot move a delay figure, and it is not part of the delivery record above.

About

Company dossier

Legal name
Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul Yatırım ve İnşaat A.Ş.
Headquarters
Kardelen Street No: 2 Floor: 41, Istanbul, Türkiye
Ataşehir · 34746
Founded
not published
Entity type
PRIVATE
Revenue
TRY 3.8 billion
2021
Business model
offplan for sale, commercial, mixed use, contracting

Offices

head office and 2 others
AnkaraBodrum

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Contact | Tahincioğlu

Tahincioğlu
NİDAPARK ÇANKAYA SALES OFFICE ... Cankaya/Ankara
value seen: Ankara
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/iletisim.php

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Contact | Tahincioğlu

Tahincioğlu
NİDAPARK GÜNDOĞAN SALES OFFICE ... Bodrum/Muğla
value seen: Bodrum
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/iletisim.php

Partners

3 partners
Nida Construction
contractor

General contractor for all Tahincioğlu projects.

Emlak Konut GYO A.Ş.
joint venture

Co-developed Palladium Cadde within Nidapark Küçükyalı.

Swissôtel
operator

Operated Swissôtel Büyük Efes and Convention Center.

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About Us | Tahincioğlu

Tahincioğlu
Tahincioğlu’s construction company Nida Construction is the general contractor for all Tahincioğlu projects
value seen: Nida Construction
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/hakkimizda.php

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About Us | Tahincioğlu

Tahincioğlu
Nida Construction is the general contractor
value seen: CONTRACTOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/hakkimizda.php

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About Us | Tahincioğlu

Tahincioğlu
Tahincioğlu’s construction company Nida Construction is the general contractor for all Tahincioğlu projects
value seen: General contractor for all Tahincioğlu projects.
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/hakkimizda.php

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Tahincioğlu’ndan “Yeni Yüzyıla 5yeni Yıldız”

Tahincioğlu
Palladium Cadde ... Emlak Konut GYO ile birlikte geliştirilen
value seen: Emlak Konut GYO A.Ş.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.tahincioglu.com/assets/files/basin_bultenleri/1696336449_.pdf

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Tahincioğlu’ndan “Yeni Yüzyıla 5yeni Yıldız”

Tahincioğlu
Emlak Konut GYO ile birlikte geliştirilen
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.tahincioglu.com/assets/files/basin_bultenleri/1696336449_.pdf

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Tahincioğlu’ndan “Yeni Yüzyıla 5yeni Yıldız”

Tahincioğlu
Emlak Konut GYO ile birlikte geliştirilen Nidapark Küçükyalı içerisinde yer alan alışveriş caddesi
value seen: Co-developed Palladium Cadde within Nidapark Küçükyalı.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.tahincioglu.com/assets/files/basin_bultenleri/1696336449_.pdf

Sources: name

CONTRACTORdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
İşletmesini Swissôtel’in yaptığı Büyük Efes ve Kongre Merkezi
value seen: Swissôtel
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/tahinciogluholding.php

Sources: partner type

CONTRACTORdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
İşletmesini Swissôtel’in yaptığı Büyük Efes ve Kongre Merkezi
value seen: OPERATOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/tahinciogluholding.php

Sources: summary

CONTRACTORdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
İşletmesini Swissôtel’in yaptığı Büyük Efes ve Kongre Merkezi
value seen: Operated Swissôtel Büyük Efes and Convention Center.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/tahinciogluholding.php

Registrations & licences

COMPANY NUMBER591923
Trade Register · TR · current operating-company registration
Jurisdiction-agnostic: a DLD number, a Companies House number and a state RERA registration all land in the same table.

Contact

Markets

1 countries
Türkiyeactive 10 projects tracked

What they build

2 types
Mixed use8 of 10
Residential, for sale2 of 10
A project counts once under each type it carries, so the shares add to more than the project count.

Management

Principals & executives

6 names found
ÖT
Özcan Tahincioğlu
Özcan Tahincioğlu is the company’s Chairman of the Board and the senior family principal identified in the company’s corporate records. Independent reporting describes his progression from Kent Gıda leadership into the family’s real-estate business, alongside board and investment roles outside Tahincioğlu.
Current title
Chairman of the Board
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Kent Gıda Maddeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.
Education
Robert College
Babson CollegeBachelor’s degree in finance and economics
Other boards
Ünlü & Co. — board memberEndeavor Türkiye — founding board member
Known for
ChairmanFamily businessReal estateEx-Kent GıdaEndeavor Türkiye
https://linkedin.com/in/ozcan-tahincioglu-a7a95253
Our new strategy is to diversify geographically within Türkiye. Forbes Middle East May 05, 2022https://forbesmiddleeast.com/featured/brand-voice/ozcan-tahincioglu-chairman-of-tahincioglu-the-rising-star-in-the-global-real-estate-world

Sources: education

PRESS2026-02-20

Özcan Tahincioğlu | Emlak Haberleri

Yeni Şafak
1969 yılında İstanbul dünyaya gelen Özcan Tahincioğlu, ortaokul ve lise eğitimini Robert Kolej’de tamamladıktan sonra ABD’de Babson Colege’da finans ve ekonomi alanında lisans eğitimi almıştır.
value seen: Robert Kolej’de ... Babson Colege’da finans ve ekonomi alanında lisans eğitimi
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/ozcan-tahincioglu-2468159

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Board Of Directors | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
Özcan Tahincioğlu Chairman of the Board
value seen: Özcan Tahincioğlu
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/yonetim_kurulu.php

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIAL2026-09-07

Ozcan Tahincioglu

LinkedIn
# Ozcan Tahincioglu Chairman / Tahincioglu Holding A.S.
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/ozcan-tahincioglu-a7a95253
https://linkedin.com/in/ozcan-tahincioglu-a7a95253

Sources: other boards

PRESS2026-02-20

Özcan Tahincioğlu | Emlak Haberleri

Yeni Şafak
Özcan Tahincioğlu'nun Ünlü & Co. Yönetim Kurulu Üyeliği ve Standard Bank Group'a bağlı özel sermaye fonu olan SU Private Equity'nin Yatırım Komitesi Üyeliği'ni de 2006 yılından bu yana sürdürmektedir. Ayrıca Türkiye'deki internet ve teknoloji firmalarına girişim sermayesi sağlayan yatırım fonu 212 Capital Partners'ın Danışma Kurulu Başkanlığı ve Hollanda merkezli yatırım fonu Revo Capital Fund I BV'nin Kurucu Başkanlığı görevlerinde bulunmaktadır.
value seen: Ünlü & Co. Yönetim Kurulu Üyeliği; Endeavor Türkiye’nin Kurucu Yönetim Kurulu Üyesidir
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/ozcan-tahincioglu-2468159

Sources: previous companies

PRESS2026-02-20

Özcan Tahincioğlu | Emlak Haberleri

Yeni Şafak
Eğitim hayatını tamamladıktan sonra kariyerine Kent Gıda Maddeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ’de başlayan Tahincioğlu burada çeşitli kademelerde görevler üstlenmiştir.
value seen: Kent Gıda Maddeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/ozcan-tahincioglu-2468159

Sources: quote

PRESS2022-05-05

Özcan Tahincioğlu, Chairman Of Tahincioğlu: The Rising Star In The Global Real Estate World

Forbes Middle East
“As a company, I always say we’re running a marathon,” states Tahincioğlu, “It’s not a sprint, and it doesn’t matter where you are on the 15th kilometer or the 30th kilometer, you only need to pace yourself and continue. And that’s what we’re trying to do.”
value seen: As a company, I always say we’re running a marathon.
https://forbesmiddleeast.com/featured/brand-voice/ozcan-tahincioglu-chairman-of-tahincioglu-the-rising-star-in-the-global-real-estate-world

Sources: quote

PRESS2022-05-05

Özcan Tahincioğlu, Chairman Of Tahincioğlu: The Rising Star In The Global Real Estate World

Forbes Middle East
“In the past, we were mainly focused on Istanbul, but we are now looking at the south of Türkiye, including potential projects in Izmir and Ankara as well as other cities. Our new strategy is to diversify geographically within Türkiye.”
value seen: Our new strategy is to diversify geographically within Türkiye.
https://forbesmiddleeast.com/featured/brand-voice/ozcan-tahincioglu-chairman-of-tahincioglu-the-rising-star-in-the-global-real-estate-world

Sources: summary

PRESS2026-02-20

Özcan Tahincioğlu | Emlak Haberleri

Yeni Şafak
Özcan Tahincioğlu, Kent Gıda bünyesinde 1994 yılında Finansman Müdür Yardımcılığı, 1999 yılında Mali ve Ticari İşlerden Sorumlu Genel Müdür Yardımcılığı, 2002 yılında Kent Gıda Yönetim Kurulu Üyeliği ve Genel Müdür Vekilliği, 2004-2013 tarihleri arasında ise Kent Gıda Yönetim Kurulu Başkanlığı görevlerini yürütmüştür.
value seen: Özcan Tahincioğlu is the company’s Chairman of the Board and the senior family principal identified in the company’s corporate records. Independent reporting describes his progression from Kent Gıda leadership into the family’s real-estate business, alongside board and investment roles outside Tahincioğlu.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/ozcan-tahincioglu-2468159

Sources: tags

PRESS2026-02-20

Özcan Tahincioğlu | Emlak Haberleri

Yeni Şafak
Özcan Tahincioğlu, halen gayrimenkul sektörünün önde gelen isimlerinden biri olan; ayrıca tarım, enerji, üretim ve hizmet sektörlerinde faaliyetlerine devam eden Tahincioğlu Holding AŞ'nin Yönetim Kurulu Başkanlığı görevini sürdürmektedir.
value seen: Chairman; Family business; Real estate; Ex-Kent Gıda; Endeavor Türkiye
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/ozcan-tahincioglu-2468159

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Board Of Directors | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
Özcan Tahincioğlu Chairman of the Board
value seen: Chairman of the Board
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/yonetim_kurulu.php
CT
Can Tahincioğlu
Can Tahincioğlu is identified in the developer’s corporate information as Vice Chairman of the Board. The group’s construction-company executive-committee page repeats that vice-chair role, supporting his position as a senior family control figure.
Current title
Vice Chairman of the Board
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
Vice ChairmanFamily business

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
| Vice Chairman of the Board | Can Tahincioğlu |
value seen: Can Tahincioğlu
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/yonetimkurulu.php

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
| Vice Chairman of the Board | Can Tahincioğlu |
value seen: Can Tahincioğlu is identified in the developer’s corporate information as Vice Chairman of the Board. The group’s construction-company executive-committee page repeats that vice-chair role, supporting his position as a senior family control figure.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/yonetimkurulu.php

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
| Vice Chairman of the Board | Can Tahincioğlu |
value seen: Vice Chairman; Family business
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/yonetimkurulu.php

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nida Construction - Tahincioğlu Holding

Tahincioğlu · carried by nidainsaat.com
| Vice Chairman of the Board | Can Tahincioğlu |
value seen: Vice Chairman of the Board
https://www.nidainsaat.com/english/yonetimkurulu.php
OT
Onur Tahincioğlu
Onur Tahincioğlu is identified by Tahincioğlu’s corporate records as a board member. Independent trade reporting separately identifies him as Chairman of Brasserie Prime and quotes his views on team structure, sustainable investment and expansion, providing relevant evidence of operating activity outside the developer.
Current title
Board Member
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
Brasserie Prime — chairman
Known for
Board memberFamily businessBrasserie Prime chairman

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Onur Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Onur Tahincioğlu
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php

Sources: other boards

PRESS2024-03-25

Brasserie Prime Board Chairman Onur Tahincioğlu interview

Food in Life
Brasserie Prime Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Onur Tahincioğlu ile konuştuk.
value seen: Brasserie Prime Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı
https://foodinlife.com/brasserie-prime-yonetim-kurulu-baskani-onur-tahincioglu-iyi-bir-ekibin-her-seyden-onemli-olduguna-inanmaktayiz

Sources: quote

PRESS2024-03-25

Brasserie Prime Board Chairman Onur Tahincioğlu interview

Food in Life
“İyi bir ekibin her şeyden önemli olduğuna inanmaktayım.” diyen Tahincioğlu
value seen: İyi bir ekibin her şeyden önemli olduğuna inanmaktayım.
value paraphrased from this source
https://foodinlife.com/brasserie-prime-yonetim-kurulu-baskani-onur-tahincioglu-iyi-bir-ekibin-her-seyden-onemli-olduguna-inanmaktayim

Sources: summary

PRESS2024-03-25

Brasserie Prime Board Chairman Onur Tahincioğlu interview

Food in Life
Brasserie Prime Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Onur Tahincioğlu ile konuştuk.
value seen: Onur Tahincioğlu is identified by Tahincioğlu’s corporate records as a board member. Independent trade reporting separately identifies him as Chairman of Brasserie Prime and quotes his views on team structure, sustainable investment and expansion, providing relevant evidence of operating activity outside the developer.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://foodinlife.com/brasserie-prime-yonetim-kurulu-baskani-onur-tahincioglu-iyi-bir-ekibin-her-seyden-onemli-olduguna-inanmaktayim

Sources: tags

PRESS2024-03-25

Brasserie Prime Board Chairman Onur Tahincioğlu interview

Food in Life
Brasserie Prime Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Onur Tahincioğlu ile konuştuk.
value seen: Board member; Family business; Brasserie Prime chairman
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://foodinlife.com/brasserie-prime-yonetim-kurulu-baskani-onur-tahincioglu-iyi-bir-ekibin-her-seyden-onemli-olduguna-inanmaktayız

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Onur Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Member of Board
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php
AT
Abdulahat Tahincioğlu
Abdulahat Tahincioğlu is named in the developer’s corporate-information page as a member of the board. No reliable independent biographical or track-record information was located in the retrieved material, so the profile is limited to that documented governance role.
Current title
Board Member
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
Board memberFamily business

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Abdulahat Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Abdulahat Tahincioğlu
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Abdulahat Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Abdulahat Tahincioğlu is named in the developer’s corporate-information page as a member of the board. No reliable independent biographical or track-record information was located in the retrieved material, so the profile is limited to that documented governance role.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Abdulahat Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Board member; Family business
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Information Society Services | Tahincioglu

Tahincioğlu
| | Abdulahat Tahincioğlu – Member of Board |
value seen: Member of Board
https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/bilgi_toplum_hizmetleri.php
MÇ
Mustafa Çakmak
Mustafa Çakmak has been Tahincioğlu’s General Manager since 2019 and is also described as a group-company board chair and general manager. His documented career spans construction, municipal real estate, project management and architecture, including KİPTAŞ, Tek Çelik, HTM Mimarlık and Nida İnşaat.
Current title
General Manager
since 2019
Experience
30+ years ’ experience
Companies before
Nida İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.HTM Mimarlık MühendislikTek Çelik Şirketler GrubuKİPTAŞBayraktar İnşaat
Education
Trakya UniversityArchitecture
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
General ManagerSince 2019ArchitectureEx-KİPTAŞ
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: education

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
Lisans eğitimini Trakya Üniversitesi Mimarlık bölümünde tamamlayan Mustafa Çakmak
value seen: Trakya Üniversitesi Mimarlık
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: full name

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
# Mustafa Çakmak Tahincioğlu şirketinde Genel Müdür
value seen: Mustafa Çakmak
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
# Mustafa Çakmak
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: previous companies

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
2014 yılında Tahincioğlu Holding Nida İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.’ye geçen Mustafa Çakmak, sırasıyla Proje Koordinatörü ve Genel Müdür Yardımcısı olarak görev yapmıştır. 2005 yılında HTM Mimarlık Mühendislik şirketini kuran Çakmak, Yönetici Şirket Ortağı olarak 2014 yılına kadar devam etmiştir. 2000 yılında Tek Çelik Şirketler Grubu’na geçerek, sırasıyla Şantiye Şefliği, Teknik Müdürlük ve Projeler Müdürlüğü görevlerini sürdürmüştür.
value seen: Nida İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.; HTM Mimarlık Mühendislik; Tek Çelik Şirketler Grubu; KİPTAŞ; Bayraktar İnşaat
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: since

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
Çakmak, 2019 yılından itibaren Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul’de Genel Müdür ve Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi olmasının yanında Grup şirketlerinde de Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı ve Genel Müdür görevlerine devam etmektir.
value seen: 2019 yılından itibaren
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: summary

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
Çakmak, 2019 yılından itibaren Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul’de Genel Müdür ve Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi olmasının yanında Grup şirketlerinde de Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı ve Genel Müdür görevlerine devam etmektir.
value seen: Mustafa Çakmak has been Tahincioğlu’s General Manager since 2019 and is also described as a group-company board chair and general manager. His documented career spans construction, municipal real estate, project management and architecture, including KİPTAŞ, Tek Çelik, HTM Mimarlık and Nida İnşaat.
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: tags

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
Total Experience: 30 years and 9 months
value seen: General Manager; Since 2019; Architecture; 30+ years’ experience; Ex-KİPTAŞ
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak

Sources: title

SOCIAL2026-09-23

Mustafa Çakmak

LinkedIn
Tahincioğlu şirketinde Genel Müdür
value seen: Genel Müdür
value paraphrased from this source
https://linkedin.com/in/mustafa%C3%A7akmak
AC
Aykut Celep
Aykut Celep is documented as Vice Chairman and General Manager of the group’s management-services subsidiary, and as General Manager of Nidapark Gayrimenkul Danışmanlık. His prior track record includes ownership of the Remax Taksim central office and earlier importing work in the optical sector.
Current title
Vice Chairman of the Board – General Manager
since 2020 September
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Remax Taksim Central Office
Education
Anadolu UniversityEconomics
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
General ManagerReal estateEx-RemaxAnadolu University

Sources: education

PRESS2020-11-09

Aykut Celep kimdir?

İmar Panosu
Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi mezunu olan Aykut Celep
value seen: Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi
https://imarpanosu.com/aykut-celep-kimdir/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nidapark Gayrimenkul

Nidapark / Tahincioğlu
#### Aykut Celep Yönetim Kurulu Başkan Vekili – Genel Müdür
value seen: Aykut Celep
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.nidapark.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu.html

Sources: previous companies

PRESS2020-11-09

Aykut Celep kimdir?

İmar Panosu
Uzun yıllar Remax Taksim Merkez ofisinin sahibi olan Celep
value seen: Remax Taksim Merkez ofisi
https://imarpanosu.com/aykut-celep-kimdir/

Sources: since

PRESS2020-11-09

Aykut Celep kimdir?

İmar Panosu
Aykut Celep, 2020 Eylül itibarı ile deneyimini Nidapark Gayrimenkul Danışmanlık A.Ş. Genel Müdürlüğü görevinde aktarmaya devam edecek.
value seen: 2020 Eylül itibarı ile
value paraphrased from this source
https://imarpanosu.com/aykut-celep-kimdir/

Sources: summary

PRESS2020-11-09

Aykut Celep kimdir?

İmar Panosu
Uzun yıllar Remax Taksim Merkez ofisinin sahibi olan Celep, gayrimenkul sektörüne sağladığı katmadeğer ve imza attığı başarılar ile birçok ödüle layık görüldü ve 17 yıl boyunca önemli projelere imza attı.
value seen: Aykut Celep is documented as Vice Chairman and General Manager of the group’s management-services subsidiary, and as General Manager of Nidapark Gayrimenkul Danışmanlık. His prior track record includes ownership of the Remax Taksim central office and earlier importing work in the optical sector.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://imarpanosu.com/aykut-celep-kimdir/

Sources: tags

PRESS2020-11-09

Aykut Celep kimdir?

İmar Panosu
Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi mezunu olan Aykut Celep, uzun yıllar boyunca optik sektöründe ithalatçılık görevini yürüttü.
value seen: General Manager; Real estate; Ex-Remax; Anadolu University
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://imarpanosu.com/aykut-celep-kimdir/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Nidapark Gayrimenkul

Nidapark / Tahincioğlu
#### Aykut Celep Yönetim Kurulu Başkan Vekili – Genel Müdür
value seen: Yönetim Kurulu Başkan Vekili – Genel Müdür
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.nidapark.com.tr/yonetim-kurulu.html

Projects

Assessment coverage

Completed projects: 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15. Initial research is capped at 10 completed projects and a separate delivery-risk search capped at 7 findings. Risk findings are not project assessment counts. Absence is not proof of a complete portfolio or no failures. Month-level dates overlapping a boundary are excluded from figures.

0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.

Stalled, cancelled & overdue projects

0 evidenced cases
The capped delivery-risk search ran; no project-level exception cases are recorded here. Risk findings are listed under Risks and are separate from assessed projects. This does not establish that the developer has no delivery failures.

Completed projects

10 projects
ProjectLocationTypeUnitsFloorsAreaCostPayment planLaunchedConstruction startOriginal targetHandoverDelayConfidenceStatus
Nidapark AyyıldızIstanbul, Türkiye
Kağıthane
mixed use951—18,000 m²—5% peşinat, 5% ara ödeme, 10% ara ödeme, 80% taksit1201806 Nisan 2018Jan 2020 – Dec 2020Jan 2022 – Dec 2022+24.0 mo
(+13.0 to +35.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark Küçükyalı HeybeliIstanbul, Türkiye
Küçükyalı
mixed use————5% / 15% / 80%1201726.10.2017Jan 2022 – Dec 2022Jan 2022 – Dec 2022dates under reviewdates under reviewcompleted
Nidapark Küçükyalı MahalleIstanbul, Türkiye
Küçükyalı
mixed use————20/80120172017 yılının Haziran ayındaJan 2022 – Dec 2022Jan 2022 – Dec 2022dates under reviewdates under reviewcompleted
Nidapark İstinye PanoramaIstanbul, Türkiye
İstinye
residential for sale2171—290,000 m²—40% peşinat ile banka kredisiz 60 ay 0 faiz1——Jan 2022 – Dec 2022Jan 2022 – Dec 2022dates under reviewdates under reviewcompleted
Nidapark Küçükyalı BurgazIstanbul, Türkiye
Küçükyalı
mixed use————25% peşinat, kalan 84 ay ve sıfır faiz120183 Mart 2018Jan 2021 – Dec 2021Jan 2021 – Dec 20210.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark Küçükyalı SedefIstanbul, Türkiye
Küçükyalı
mixed use————%25 peşinat, kalan konut bedeli 84 ay vade farksız taksitlendirme1201805 Mart 2018Jan 2021 – Dec 2021Jan 2021 – Dec 20210.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark Küçükyalı KınalıIstanbul, Türkiye
Küçükyalı
mixed use————yüzde 25 peşinat; kalan tutar 84 ay vade ve yüzde sıfır faiz1——Jan 2020 – Dec 2020Jan 2020 – Dec 20200.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark KayaşehirIstanbul, Türkiye
Kayaşehir
mixed use————5% / 15% / 80%1201629 Eylül 2016Jan 2019 – Dec 2019Jan 2019 – Dec 20190.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark BaşakşehirIstanbul, Türkiye
Başakşehir
mixed use3741—105,000 m²—%25 peşinat, kalan bedel banka kredisiyle taksitlendiriliyor1201529 Eylül 2015Jan 2017 – Dec 2017Jan 2017 – Dec 20170.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Nidapark SeyrantepeIstanbul, Türkiye
Seyrantepe
residential for sale368128 floors each89,000 m²——201412.11.2014Jan 2017 – Dec 2017Jan 2017 – Dec 20170.0 mo
(−11.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
Click any row for the sources behind it. Cost basis matters: an estimated cost, a construction loan and a sale price are different numbers. Each row states which one it is, so they are never averaged together.

Awards

Awards & recognition

6 found
RANKING Ranked 2019 awards; reported February 17, 2020
Real Estate Stars / Gayrimenkul Liderleri — Türkiye’s highest company by turnover in residential sales
Capital reports that Tahincioğlu ranked first in Turkey for residential sales by turnover in the Real Estate Stars 2019 awards.
SUSTAINABILITY Certified 2018
LEED Gold Certification · Nidapark Seyrantepe
The project owner is identified as Tahincioğlu Gayrimenkul İnşaat ve Turizm A.Ş.; Nidapark Seyrantepe achieved LEED Gold certification under LEED v2009 New Construction.
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) · https://www.altensis.com/proje/nidapark-seyrantepe-2/
PROJECT AWARD Winner 2018; reported September 18, 2018
European Property Awards — Residential High-rise Architecture · Nidapark Seyrantepe
Tahincioğlu reports that Nidapark Seyrantepe won the Residential High-rise Architecture category at the European Property Awards.
PROJECT AWARD Winner 2018; ceremony held November 4, 2018
Sign of the City Awards — Best High-Rise Residence · Nidapark Seyrantepe
Tahincioğlu reports that Nidapark Seyrantepe won the Best High-Rise Residence category.
COMPANY AWARD Winner 2019
Real Estate Stars / Gayrimenkul Liderleri — seven category awards
Tahincioğlu reports seven awards, including first place for 2017 office-project sales by turnover, housing production and housing sales by turnover, plus additional ranked places in office construction and project-delivery categories.
Capital and Ekonomist, with GYODER and the Turkish Contractors Association support · https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/oduller.php
COMPANY AWARD Winner 2019
İstanbul Marketing Awards — Sports Communication
The developer reports that its #BUOYUNDASINIRYOK campaign won in the sports communication category.
İstanbul Marketing Awards · https://www.tahincioglu.com/en/oduller.php

Risks

Auditor & credit ratings

audited accounts
AuditorDRT Bağımsız Denetim ve Serbest Muhasebeci Mali Müşavirlik A.Ş

Risk flags

5 found
DELIVERY DELAY Reported 25 August 2025; contractual delivery date June 2024; reported company indication of possible completion by end-2026 (future commitment, not verified completion).
A buyer alleged that the Nidapark Küçükyalı Büyükada B10 apartment, contracted for delivery in June 2024, remained undelivered 14 months later; the buyer said the company reported a possible delay until the end of 2026 and offered no compensation. This is a buyer allegation reported in August 2025, and the source does not establish whether delivery occurred by the research date.
DELIVERY DELAY Reported 13 January 2025; alleged contractual/completion date June 2024.
A buyer alleged that the Nidapark Küçükyalı Büyükada project was still only at foundation stage in January 2025 despite a June 2024 completion date, and said Tahincioğlu and Emlak Konut did not provide an explanation. The report is an unverified customer complaint rather than an adjudicated finding.
RISK Reported 27 September 2023; alleged handover approximately 5 May 2023.
A buyer alleged that Nidakule Kayaşehir offices were handed over in May 2023 without electricity, water or an occupancy permit (iskan), while common charges were being collected; no resolution or company response is documented on the retrieved page.
RISK Reported 7 July 2024.
An office owner alleged that 40-square-metre Başakşehir Nidakule units were charged monthly dues of about TRY 10,000–15,000, which the owner said exceeded nearby residential rents, and threatened legal action; this remains an unverified complaint.
DELIVERY DELAY Kaynak yayın tarihleri: 13 Ocak 2025, 25 Ağustos 2025 ve 17 Mart 2026; araştırma tarihi: 9 Ekim 2026. Sözleşmesel teslim iddiaları: Haziran 2024, Ekim 2024 ve Kasım 2024; bildirilen ileri tarihler: 2026 sonu ve 2028 (gelecek taahhütleri gerçekleşmiş teslim sayılmamıştır).
Nidapark Küçükyalı’nın Büyükada etabında, Tahincioğlu İnşaat’ın geliştirici/yüklenici olarak anıldığı projede, tüketici bildirimlerine göre sözleşmesel teslim tarihleri 2024 Haziran–Kasım döneminde aşılmış; Ağustos 2025 ve Mart 2026 tarihli bildirimlerde dairelerin hâlâ teslim edilmediği, bazı bölümlerde binanın dahi bulunmadığı ve inşaatın fiilen ilerlemediği/stall ettiği ileri sürülüyor. Bildirimlerde Tahincioğlu tarafından teslimin 2026 sonuna, başka bir görüşmede ise projenin bitişinin 2028’e revize edildiği aktarılıyor; bunlar şirketin bağımsız teyitli açıklaması değil, tüketici beyanlarıdır. Emlak Konut’un Ocak 2025 tarihli değerleme raporu projenin mevcut durum ve tamamlanması hâlindeki değerlerini ayrı ayrı ele alıyor, ancak tek başına teslim edilmediğini kanıtlamıyor.

Record status

active
Coverageactive
Tracked sinceOctober 9, 2026
Last checkedOctober 9, 2026 this month
Profile last researchedOctober 9, 2026
Claim
Work for this company? Claiming lets you correct the record with sources and get alerts when it changes.
For informational purposes only. This information is not investment, financial or credit advice and should not be relied on for investment, lending or credit decisions. Records may be incomplete or outdated. Verify information independently and seek qualified advice before making a decision.