UOL develops and invests in residential communities, offices, retail, mixed-use districts and hospitality assets, primarily in Singapore with selected international markets. It serves homebuyers, tenants, investors, hotel guests and institutional partners through for-sale, investment and management-oriented real-estate businesses across sectors.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
| Project | Overall | Structure & systems | Management & living |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clavon05, Singapore640 units | 9.0/ 10 | —/ 10 | 9.0/ 10 |
The 4.7/5 building rating from 60 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.9 on the prescribed curve. The 99.co 4.9/5 result is higher but has only 20 reviews, while PropertyGuru’s 8-review rating is excluded from anchoring; recurring positive commentary supports a modest uplift, offset by minor transport and traffic-noise cautions. | Not found in sources: Limited lived-in management feedback | ||
no notes returned no links returned | Published reviews praise the daily setup: one resident-facing entry calls the amenities “truly impressive,” while another cites “lots of function rooms” and charging-equipped study/work areas. The main cautions are the AYE noise and transport distance: the pool “wouldn't exactly be the quiet oasis,” and the review analysis calls the MRT walk Clavon’s “biggest downside”; current management and staff performance remain lightly evidenced. | ||
| Pan Pacific OrchardSingapore347 units | 8.8/ 10 | 7.5/ 10 | 8.1/ 10 Tripadvisor 4.7/5, 4.9/5, 4.8/5, 4.5/5 · 1,554 reviews · tripadvisor.com Booking.com 8.8/10, 8.9/10, 9.1/10, 9.2/10, 7.9/10, 9/10, 8.7/10 · 1,959 reviews · booking.com Trip.com 9.2/10, 8.9/10, 8.9/10, 9.3/10 · 1,641 reviews · sg.trip.com Combined from 15 published figures on 3 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 8.1. |
Booking.com has the largest reported review base and its published 8.5/10 overall score converts to 8.5 on the requested curve. Current 2026 Trip.com and Tripadvisor material is strongly positive on service, cleanliness, pools, architecture and location, while the older opening-period review documents operational and plumbing weaknesses; the resulting overall score is therefore 8.8, with structure held lower at 7.5 because the published evidence contains specific but non-catastrophic water and fixture complaints. | |||
Structural comments are mostly positive because reviewers repeatedly describe the rooms and pools as clean, modern and well maintained. However, reported infrastructure issues include water that ranged from “scalding hot to lukewarm,” low water pressure, and a toilet flush that required pressing “really hard”; the detailed temperature/housekeeping account is from the June 2023 opening period, so its current status is uncertain. | The prevailing daily experience is favorable: guests call the staff “super friendly and professional,” praise the pools and greenery, and describe the location as convenient. Counterevidence includes “constant music,” small rooms, poor executive-lounge food, and an opening-period report of housekeeping arriving late and not completing cleaning; the latter is historical rather than proof of a current condition. | ||
| The Clement Canopy05, Singapore505 units | 8.0/ 10 | —/ 10 | 8.0/ 10 |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest review base at 4.4/5 from 118 reviews, which converts to 8.2/10 and sets the level. The score is reduced slightly for repeated security complaints and retained at a living-quality level supported by repeated praise for upkeep, facilities and convenience. No published evidence sufficient to score structural systems was found. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Resident reviews describe the development as “well maintained, quiet and with all the necessary facilities,” and praise its pools, tennis court, greenery, study rooms and shuttle bus. The main operational criticism is inconsistent security conduct—“some of them can be quite condescending, or rude”—alongside one report that obtaining a facilities deposit refund took “several month[s].” The independent 2019 review also cautioned that AYE traffic and adjacent construction could create noise, although the multi-storey carpark and landscaping were intended to reduce it. | ||
| Avenue South Residence02, Singapore1,074 units | 7.8/ 10 | 6.6/ 10 PropertyGuru 3.9/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 3.9/5 from 16 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 6.6. | 6.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 4.1/5, 4.3/5, 4.1/5, 3.8/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 4 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps supplies the largest published review base, at 4.3/5 from 138 reviews, which converts to 7.9/10 and sets the level. The reported complaints about rectification delays, management uncertainty, noise and termites warrant a modest downward adjustment, while repeated praise for views, facilities, location and community offsets part of that movement. Structural scoring is more cautious because the published evidence includes both a 3.9/5 interior sub-score and specific termite/rectification complaints. | |||
PropertyGuru publishes an Interior / Units score of 3.9/5 and includes a review saying, “Wood cabinets are cheaply built and infested with termites.” Another review says traffic and wind noise can become “unbearable,” while the 2023 resident account says affected wood furniture was being replaced and described UOL as efficient in rectifying the reported termite problems. | Reviews praise the “unblocked wonderful day and night views,” infinity pool, karaoke rooms, function rooms and Rail Corridor access. Operational feedback is mixed: one resident reported that the main contractor was late or absent and needed “5+ appointments” for one issue, while another reported management conflict and that the Management Agent had resigned; Google review excerpts also say facilities can be crowded. | ||
| Botanique at Bartley19, Singapore797 units | 7.4/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.4/ 10 |
No eligible review-platform rating was available for scoring because the only published aggregate located was the Property Finder/PropertyGuru figure, which the rules exclude. The score therefore uses the eight written reviews read: seven positive and one negative, with a modest downward adjustment for recurring road noise and management/security criticism; structural performance remains unevidenced. | |||
The published comments describe the building and grounds as “well maintained,” with landscaping that became “lush” two years after TOP. No specific published resident evidence was found about plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems, leaks, waterproofing, lifts or other underlying engineering performance. | Residents praised the “resort feel,” wellness pool, aqua gym and forest clubhouse, while another review said the estate was “gorgeous,” “very clean” and convenient. The main operational concern was a report of “Unfriendly staff, whether managment or security,” alongside road noise; separate discussion also described road-facing units as “Quite noisy.” | ||
| The Watergardens at Canberra27, Singapore448 units | 7.4/ 10 | —/ 10 | —/ 10 |
PropertyGuru publishes a 5.0/5 building rating, but it is based on only one review and therefore cannot be used as the scoring anchor under the stated rules. The one written review is positive, but fewer than three written reviews were read, so the overall, structure and living scores remain null; the published evidence is also limited and partly pre-completion or editorial. | Not found in sources: Limited retail convenience noted in forum commentary · Limited independent resident feedback | ||
No resident review reported a structural or systems failure. The independent Stacked Homes inspection nevertheless criticised block spacing as close as 6 metres in places, saying it could “hinder the airflow” and “compromise on the privacy” of residents; it also noted the absence of a tennis court and gas hobs in the reviewed layouts. | The sole PropertyGuru resident review called it a “cozy relaxing condo” and praised a quiet life away from stressful city office work. The independent Stacked Homes review praised the two pools and said facilities were “adequate for 448 units,” but found the location less attractive for drivers because it is far from major expressways; current day-to-day management quality remains uncertain because the published resident sample is only one review. | ||
| MeyerHouse15, Singapore56 units | 7.1/ 10 | 6.9/ 10 Stacked Homes 4/5, 4.5/5 · no review count · stackedhomes.com Combined from 2 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. | 6.3/ 10 Stacked Homes 4.5/5, 2.5/5, 4/5, 4.5/5, 3.5/5, 3.5/5, 2/5 · no review count · stackedhomes.com Combined from 7 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.3. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest qualifying review base, 15 reviews at 4.2/5, which converts to 7.8 before commentary. The score is moderated by repeated management/security complaints and limited-accessibility/high-cost criticism, with recurring praise preventing a larger reduction; structural evidence supports a separate 7.0 structure view, while living evidence supports 6.6. | |||
The available building-focused editorial review rated “Quality of Finishings” 4.5/5 and described the interiors as “suitably upscale and distinguished,” while a separate review called them “all gorgeous and interiors so premium.” It also noted that the bathrooms have no ventilation windows and that the kitchen was the least impressive part, but no resident-reported leaks, flooding, lift failures or other serious systems defects were found. | Daily-life feedback is strongest on privacy and setting: reviewers mention “each house has its own private lift” and a “Great location right beside the park.” The negative operational feedback is consistent across two sources: one resident said management and security “sucked,” while another described management as having an “uppity attitude”; the editorial review also says the development has relatively few facilities and steep maintenance costs. | ||
| One Bishopsgate PlazaLondon160 units | 7.0/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.0/ 10 |
The only building-specific published aggregate located is the Google Reviews/Maps listing at 4.0/5 from 4 reviews, which converts to 7.0/10 under the specified curve. Because the aggregate has fewer than 10 reviews, the result is kept at the conversion level and is treated as low-confidence; no recurring, qualifying complaint or praise theme was used to move it. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Published commentary describes the operational experience positively: Business Traveller called the staff “professional and efficient” with a personal welcome, while a 2026 review described the lobby staff as moving with “conspicuous calm.” Building-specific user comments praise the “beautiful specifications” and the view from the 34th-floor terrace, although one reviewer objected that the upper floors were largely empty and noted that the terrace was residents-only. | ||
| The Tre Ver13, Singapore729 units | 6.1/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base at 3.6/5 from 60 reviews, which converts to 5.8 under the requested curve. The score is pulled down to 5.3 by the reported termite infestation, workmanship and repair problems, management delays and a security complaint, partly offset by repeated praise for facilities, views and quiet surroundings. The structural score is lower than the living score because the available physical-condition evidence is predominantly negative; the July 2026 reporting is current within the requested window, but the number of affected units remains uncertain because the developer and MCST did not provide a full total. | |||
Published reporting in July 2026 said at least 50 units were believed to have experienced termite issues since December 2022; an inspection found signs in fewer than 10 of 61 vacant units checked between December 2022 and April 2023. Residents also reported that “the termites kept appearing” in a developer-built wardrobe, while a Google reviewer said the bathroom had leaked twice and the carpark door remained broken; these are reported defects, not a current engineering certification. | Residents praised the setting and facilities: one called it “quiet and serene,” another said the pools were “absolutely incredible,” and a February 2026 reviewer said the new management team was more efficient and checked the estate daily. Against that, reviewers described “Worst management ever” over an app-deposit delay and reported that security staff failed to respond at the visitor lane and spoke rudely. |
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
PARKTOWN Residence is a 50:50 joint development integrated with a transportation hub.
Kheng Leong joined UOL in the 80:20 Dorset Road residential site consortium.
China Jinmao Holdings joined UOL and Kheng Leong in the 7:3:90 THE PUYUAN residential-site joint venture.
UOL announced a partnership with Hilton to launch the NoMad hotel in Singapore in 2026.
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50), PARKTOWN Residence is Singapore’s largest residential and lifestyle development integrated with a transportation hub.
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50)
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50), PARKTOWN Residence is Singapore’s largest residential and lifestyle development integrated with a transportation hub.
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
| COMPANY NUMBER | 196300438C Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) · Singapore · Live company |
| Singapore | active 8 projects tracked |
| Australia | active 0 projects tracked |
| United Kingdom | active 1 project tracked |
| China | active 0 projects tracked |
| Residential, for sale | 7 of 9 |
| Hotel | 2 of 9 |
| Mixed use | 1 of 9 |
| Hotel residences | 1 of 9 |
| Office | 1 of 9 |
| Retail | 1 of 9 |
- Bachelor of Arts (Economics), Clark University, USA
## Wee Ee Lim Chairman
- Singapore Land Group Limited (Chairman) - United Overseas Bank Limited - Haw Par Corporation Limited - Wee Foundation (Director)
Mr Wee joined the Haw Par Group in 1986
was appointed as Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024.
Mr Wee, aged 64 (as at date of the upcoming 63 rd AGM), was appointed as Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024.
Mr Wee is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Haw Par Corporation Limited, an SGX-listed company with businesses in the healthcare, leisure, property and investment sectors. Mr Wee joined the Haw Par Group in 1986 and was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in 2003. He has been closely involved in the management and growth of the Haw Par Group for more than 30 years.
## Wee Ee Lim Chairman
“As a developer we often play the curatorial role, empowering innovation and good design, delivering leadership in the execution, and pushing for collaboration in all that we set out to do.”EdgeProp 28 October 2022https://www.edgeprop.sg/property-news/beyond-profitability-crafting-value-next-measure-success-uol-and-kheng-leong
- Bachelor of Architecture, University of Singapore
## Liam Wee Sin Group Chief Executive
- Singapore Land Group Limited - UOL Group Limited (Group Chief Executive) - Director of various UOL subsidiaries
“As a developer we often play the curatorial role, empowering innovation and good design, delivering leadership in the execution, and pushing for collaboration in all that we set out to do,” says Liam.
was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019.
Mr Liam was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019. In his over 30 years of service with the Group, Mr Liam has led and strengthened the Group’s position as a leading diversified property and hospitality company with a global footprint.
In his over 30 years of service with the Group, Mr Liam has led and strengthened the Group’s position as a leading diversified property and hospitality company with a global footprint. Additionally, Mr Liam was the first vice-president of the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (“REDAS”).
## Liam Wee Sin Group Chief Executive
Mr Ng holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Manchester, United Kingdom, and a Bachelor of Accountancy (Honours) degree from the Nanyang Technological University.
## Ng Tiang Poh Eric Chief Financial Officer UOL Group Limited
Before joining UOL, he held various senior roles within large multinational companies, including seven years with Keppel Limited and 10 years with the Singapore Power Group. Mr Ng started his career at KPMG Singapore as an auditor.
Mr Ng was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2024.
Mr Ng was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2024. He oversees the Finance, Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations functions of the Group. Mr Ng has more than 25 years of experience in large multinational companies.
Mr Ng has more than 25 years of experience in large multinational companies, handling roles in group reporting, corporate finance, investment management, financial control, corporate tax and treasury.
## Ng Tiang Poh Eric Chief Financial Officer UOL Group Limited
## Neo Soon Hup Chief Operating Officer UOL Group Limited
Prior to this, he was Chief Operating Officer of PPHG since March 2020. Before joining PPHG in 2003, Mr Neo spent more than a decade with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Mr Neo was appointed Chief Operating Officer on 1 September 2022.
Mr Neo was appointed Chief Operating Officer on 1 September 2022. He oversees the asset management of the Group’s hospitality portfolio, information technology, corporate engineering & development and centre management of UOL’s commercial portfolio.
Prior to this, he was Chief Operating Officer of PPHG since March 2020. Before joining PPHG in 2003, Mr Neo spent more than a decade with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
## Neo Soon Hup Chief Operating Officer UOL Group Limited
Ms Tan holds a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate from the National University of Singapore.
## Yvonne Tan Chief Corporate and Development Officer UOL Group Limited
She also serves as a Director of several subsidiaries of the Group and is a Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (REDAS) alternate Management Committee member.
Prior to that, she had experience working at Jones Lang LaSalle and Defence Science and Technology Agency.
Ms Tan is the Chief Corporate and Development Officer responsible for driving the Group’s strategy development and corporate matters in the Group Chief Executive’s Office. She also oversees the Development business, covering Residential Marketing and Project Development.
She also oversees the Development business, covering Residential Marketing and Project Development. Ms Tan holds a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate
## Yvonne Tan Chief Corporate and Development Officer UOL Group Limited
“We remain focused on establishing the brand as a trusted global hospitality group.”Hotel Management 15 March 2024https://www.hotelmanagement.com.au/2024/03/15/exclusive-pan-pacific-hotels-group-ceo-on-repositioning-brands-for-global-growth/
Mr Choe graduated with a Bachelor of Science (Distinction) degree from Cornell University (Ithaca, New York).
## Choe Peng Sum Chief Executive Officer Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
He was previously chief executive officer of Frasers Hospitality International Ltd and also board of director for the Frasers Hospitality Trust.
Prior to joining PPHG, Mr Choe was senior adviser to Frasers Property Limited. He was previously chief executive officer of Frasers Hospitality International Ltd
At Pan Pacific Hotels Group, we remain focused on establishing the brand as a trusted global hospitality group.
Mr Choe was appointed Chief Executive Officer of PPHG on 1 September 2019.
With over 40 years of global hospitality experience, he leads PPHG’s overall strategy, overseeing the development, management, and operations of its hotels and serviced apartments worldwide. Prior to joining PPHG, Mr Choe was senior adviser to Frasers Property Limited.
With over 40 years of global hospitality experience
## Choe Peng Sum Chief Executive Officer Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
0 undated completions and 1 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.
| Project | Location | Type | Units | Floors | Area | Cost | Payment plan | Launched | Construction start | Original target | Handover | Delay | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Watergardens at Canberra | Singapore, Singapore 27 | residential for sale | 4481 | five | — | — | 5% (Booking Fee); 20% less Booking Fee; 10%; 10%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 25%; 15%1 | 2021 | 28 August 2021 | Jul 2024 – Dec 2024 | Jul 2025 | +9.5 mo (+7.0 to +12.0) | sourced | completed |
| Clavon | Singapore, Singapore 05 | residential for sale | 6401 | — | — | — | 5% (Booking Fee) / 20% less Booking Fee / 10% / 10% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 25% / 15%1 | 2020 | 12 December 2020 | Jul 2023 – Dec 2023 | May 2025 | +19.5 mo (+17.0 to +22.0) | sourced | completed |
| Pan Pacific Orchard | Singapore, Singapore | hotel | 3471 | 23 storeys | — | — | — | 2018 | April 2018 | Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | Oct 2023 | +27.5 mo (+22.0 to +33.0) | sourced | completed |
| Avenue South Residence | Singapore, Singapore 02 | residential for sale | 1,0741 | Two 56-storey towers plus five conserved four-storey apartment blocks | — | — | 5% (Booking Fee); 20% less Booking Fee; 10%; 10%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 25%; 15%1 | 2019 | September 2019 | Apr 2022 – Jun 2022 | Jul 2023 | +14.0 mo (+13.0 to +15.0) | sourced | completed |
| MeyerHouse | Singapore, Singapore 15 | residential for sale | 561 | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 June 2019 | Apr 2023 | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | dates under review | dates under review | completed |
| The Tre Ver | Singapore, Singapore 13 | residential for sale | 7291 | — | — | — | 5% (Booking Fee), 20% less Booking Fee, 10%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 25%, 15%1 | 2018 | 4 August 2018 | Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | +12.0 mo (+1.0 to +23.0) | sourced | completed |
| One Bishopsgate Plaza | London, United Kingdom | mixed use, hotel, hotel residences, office, retail | 1601 | 43 storeys | 50,000 m² | — | 10% / 90%1 | — | — | — | Sep 2021 | — | not scorable | completed |
| Botanique at Bartley | Singapore, Singapore 19 | residential for sale | 7971 | Nine blocks of 17-storey apartments | — | — | — | 2014 | 2014 | Jan 2019 – Dec 2019 | Jul 2019 | +0.5 mo (−5.0 to +6.0) | sourced | completed |
| The Clement Canopy | Singapore, Singapore 05 | residential for sale | 5051 | Two 40-storey tower blocks | — | — | — | 2017 | February 2017 | Oct 2020 – Dec 2020 | Mar 2019 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Auditor | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| Coverage | active |
| Tracked since | October 11, 2026 |
| Last checked | October 12, 2026 this month |
| Profile last researched | October 12, 2026 |
| Claim |