Artificial Intelligence
Builders Company
U
UOLSingapore, Singapore · founded 1963 · 4 active markets
PUBLIC LISTED

UOL develops and invests in residential communities, offices, retail, mixed-use districts and hospitality assets, primarily in Singapore with selected international markets. It serves homebuyers, tenants, investors, hotel guests and institutional partners through for-sale, investment and management-oriented real-estate businesses across sectors.

Years in business
63
founded 1963
LinkedIn headcount
200
employees, as shown on LinkedIn · not stated on page · size band 1,001–5,000
Projects last researched October 12, 2026
Every figure on this card was read out of a document.

Overview

Investor tear sheet

a summary of the tabs that follow · no rating of our own

Company dossier

Legal name
UOL Group Limited1
Headquarters
101 Thomson Road, #33-001, Singapore1, Singapore
Founded
19631
Entity type
PUBLIC LISTED1
Business model
offplan for sale1, commercial1, mixed use1
Markets
4 markets listed
What they build
Residential, for sale (7 of 9) · Hotel (2 of 9) · Mixed use (1 of 9)
Full dossier in About →

Delivery record

6 date-assessed of 9 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 1 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
9
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+13.0 mo
the middle of 6 scored projects
Average delay
+13.8 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
4.7 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+27.5 mo
Pan Pacific Orchard · +22.0 to +33.0
1
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
3
red rows below

Against other developers

6 date-assessed here · 8 developers, 40 date-assessed projects in Singapore
Median delay
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
+13.0 mo vs +3.3 mo
this developer 9.7 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
+13.8 mo vs +4.7 mo
this developer 9.1 mo worse
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
17% vs 60%
this developer 43 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
4.7 yrs vs 4.1 yrs
this developer 0.6 yrs slower
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 39 in the market.
Projects and timelines in Track Record →

Resident experience

9 of 9 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
7.6/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
7.2/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.6/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 8 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 8 developers, 55 rated buildings in Singapore
Overall rating
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.6 vs 7.8
this developer 0.2 worse
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 55 in the market.
Structure & systems
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.2 vs 7.2
this developer is level
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 27 in the market.
Management & living
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.6 vs 7.5
this developer 0.1 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 8 of 9 rated buildings here and 54 in the market.
The market here is Singapore: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.
Ratings by building →

Awards & recognition

All awards →

Risks & source coverage

  • SAFETY / LABOUR Reported January 28, 2025; incident date not stated in the retrieved page A Bangladeshi worker employed by Nardev Builders died after falling into collapsed soil during lifting work at the Clifford Centre redevelopment site, which was being developed by S.L. Properties, a Singapore Land Group subsidiary and therefore a UOL Group subsidiary; Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower investigated and ordered main contractor Woh Hup to halt substructure works. SingLand said it was saddened and would support the family; the source does not report a finding of liability against UOL or SingLand.
  • RISK Reported July 27, 2026; reported complaints at The Tre Ver dated from December 2022 onward Residents of UOL-developed The Tre Ver reported recurring drywood-termite infestations in built-in wardrobes and cabinets; the developer said about 15 homeowners were affected, while a former resident cited at least 50 complaints, and UOL said it would arrange inspections and remedial measures. The report also described similar termite findings at UOL’s Avenue South Residence; BCA said termite infestation is a defect, while noting that the issues did not necessarily affect UOL’s overall quality banding.
  • LEGAL Judgment dated August 19, 2021; purchasers took possession in June 2013 and UOL filed the application on June 19, 2020 Purchasers in a dispute with UOL Development (Dakota) alleged that the developer failed or refused to rectify defective, structurally unsafe casement windows at Waterbank at Dakota and identified 146 defective items; the High Court did not determine the defects merits, but held that UOL was entitled to release of the S$64,450 stakeholding sum under the applicable dispute mechanism, while partly allowing the purchasers’ appeal concerning interest after UOL’s delayed application.
  • 1 more in Risk & Sources
Record status
active
Company sources
115 source entries across 115 fields
Projects tracked
10 · 9 completed in assessment
All flags and sources →

Track Record

Delivery record

6 date-assessed of 9 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 1 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
9
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+13.0 mo
the middle of 6 scored projects
Average delay
+13.8 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
4.7 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+27.5 mo
Pan Pacific Orchard · +22.0 to +33.0
1
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
3
red rows below

Against other developers

6 date-assessed here · 8 developers, 40 date-assessed projects in Singapore
Median delay
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
+13.0 mo vs +3.3 mo
this developer 9.7 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
+13.8 mo vs +4.7 mo
this developer 9.1 mo worse
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
17% vs 60%
this developer 43 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
UOL·8 developers in Singapore
4.7 yrs vs 4.1 yrs
this developer 0.6 yrs slower
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 39 in the market.
The market here is Singapore: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because planning regimes and reporting norms move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a size band. Read the two delay figures together. A median close to the market with a much better average means no single disaster; the reverse means one project is carrying the record. Time to deliver runs from the earliest start we hold to the completion itself — a construction start where a source gave one, otherwise a sales launch, otherwise the launch year read as its January. A handover the sources place only inside a year is read as that December, so a duration is the widest the record allows rather than the flattering end of it. Only delivered projects dated at both ends count, so it is taken over fewer projects than the delay figures, and a long build is not a fault: a tower is not a villa run. Sourced figures only, both sides, and values taken from documents held on file are excluded here — a developer who shares their records should not score better than one who does not.

Construction start to handover

9 of 9 projects dated · 2 places
Based on covered projects with documented construction or launch dates and available handover dates. Timelines vary by project and may not represent the developer’s full portfolio.
Construction start, or the launchTarget completion (window)Completion or handover, as reportedCurrently statedLaunch year only, no date publishedEarly or ≤6 mo lateOver 6–12 mo lateOver 12 mo lateStalled
Singapore, Singapore
London, United Kingdom
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027todaySINGAPORE, SINGAPORE+9.5 moverified+19.5 moverified+27.5 moverified+14 moverifieddates under review+12 moverified+0.5 moverified>9 mo earlyestimatedLONDON, UNITED KINGDOMcompleted, no target published
Click a row in the chart to open a project, or a table row below to see its sources. The chart runs wider than the page where the record spans many years — scroll it sideways to follow a project to its handover. Every date we have is drawn. A hollow marker is only a launch year, not a date anyone published. No dates published means we looked and found none; dates not yet checked means we have not looked yet. Handing over is not finished — rows say which. A delay is shown when one source gives the promised date and another gives the real one, however rough: "2019" still counts, and the row shows how wide that is. Projects missing one of the two dates, or with sources that disagree, are left out of the figures. 2 turned out to be about something else — a phase, a neighbour, the wider masterplan — and are marked off-subject.

Building & Livability Ratings

Resident experience

9 of 9 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
7.6/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
7.2/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.6/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 8 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 8 developers, 55 rated buildings in Singapore
Overall rating
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.6 vs 7.8
this developer 0.2 worse
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 55 in the market.
Structure & systems
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.2 vs 7.2
this developer is level
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 27 in the market.
Management & living
UOL · 8 other developers in Singapore
7.6 vs 7.5
this developer 0.1 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 8 of 9 rated buildings here and 54 in the market.
The market here is Singapore: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.

By building

9 rated · 0 not rated · scale 1–10
ProjectOverallStructure & systemsManagement & living
Clavon05, Singapore640 units
9.0/ 10
—/ 10
9.0/ 10

The 4.7/5 building rating from 60 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.9 on the prescribed curve. The 99.co 4.9/5 result is higher but has only 20 reviews, while PropertyGuru’s 8-review rating is excluded from anchoring; recurring positive commentary supports a modest uplift, offset by minor transport and traffic-noise cautions.

+ Impressive amenities+ Function rooms and work/study areas+ Bus stop and MRT access+ Nearby schools and shops+ Polite security during preview
− AYE traffic noise− Longer MRT walk− Pool may be crowded− Some common interiors less impressive
Not found in sources: Limited lived-in management feedback

no notes returned

no links returned

Published reviews praise the daily setup: one resident-facing entry calls the amenities “truly impressive,” while another cites “lots of function rooms” and charging-equipped study/work areas. The main cautions are the AYE noise and transport distance: the pool “wouldn't exactly be the quiet oasis,” and the review analysis calls the MRT walk Clavon’s “biggest downside”; current management and staff performance remain lightly evidenced.

Pan Pacific OrchardSingapore347 units
8.8/ 10
7.5/ 10
8.1/ 10
Tripadvisor 4.7/5, 4.9/5, 4.8/5, 4.5/5 · 1,554 reviews · tripadvisor.com
Booking.com 8.8/10, 8.9/10, 9.1/10, 9.2/10, 7.9/10, 9/10, 8.7/10 · 1,959 reviews · booking.com
Trip.com 9.2/10, 8.9/10, 8.9/10, 9.3/10 · 1,641 reviews · sg.trip.com
Combined from 15 published figures on 3 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 8.1.

Booking.com has the largest reported review base and its published 8.5/10 overall score converts to 8.5 on the requested curve. Current 2026 Trip.com and Tripadvisor material is strongly positive on service, cleanliness, pools, architecture and location, while the older opening-period review documents operational and plumbing weaknesses; the resulting overall score is therefore 8.8, with structure held lower at 7.5 because the published evidence contains specific but non-catastrophic water and fixture complaints.

+ Clean rooms+ Clean pool+ Modern new structure+ Well-maintained facilities
− Inconsistent shower temperature− Low water pressure− Problematic toilet flush− Small-room design constraints
+ Friendly staff+ Attentive club-lounge service+ Excellent pools and greenery+ Strong Orchard location+ Highly regarded breakfast
− Compact rooms− Occasional noise/music− Expensive or poor-value dining− Executive-lounge food complaints− Opening-period service lapses

Structural comments are mostly positive because reviewers repeatedly describe the rooms and pools as clean, modern and well maintained. However, reported infrastructure issues include water that ranged from “scalding hot to lukewarm,” low water pressure, and a toilet flush that required pressing “really hard”; the detailed temperature/housekeeping account is from the June 2023 opening period, so its current status is uncertain.

The prevailing daily experience is favorable: guests call the staff “super friendly and professional,” praise the pools and greenery, and describe the location as convenient. Counterevidence includes “constant music,” small rooms, poor executive-lounge food, and an opening-period report of housekeeping arriving late and not completing cleaning; the latter is historical rather than proof of a current condition.

The Clement Canopy05, Singapore505 units
8.0/ 10
—/ 10
8.0/ 10

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest review base at 4.4/5 from 118 reviews, which converts to 8.2/10 and sets the level. The score is reduced slightly for repeated security complaints and retained at a living-quality level supported by repeated praise for upkeep, facilities and convenience. No published evidence sufficient to score structural systems was found.

+ Well-maintained common areas+ Resort-like landscaping+ Extensive pool and recreation facilities+ Frequent MRT shuttle+ Convenient nearby amenities
− Rude or condescending security reports− Slow facilities-deposit refunds− Facilities could be improved

no notes returned

no links returned

Resident reviews describe the development as “well maintained, quiet and with all the necessary facilities,” and praise its pools, tennis court, greenery, study rooms and shuttle bus. The main operational criticism is inconsistent security conduct—“some of them can be quite condescending, or rude”—alongside one report that obtaining a facilities deposit refund took “several month[s].” The independent 2019 review also cautioned that AYE traffic and adjacent construction could create noise, although the multi-storey carpark and landscaping were intended to reduce it.

Avenue South Residence02, Singapore1,074 units
7.8/ 10
6.6/ 10
PropertyGuru 3.9/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg
PropertyGuru publishes 3.9/5 from 16 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 6.6.
6.9/ 10
PropertyGuru 4.1/5, 4.3/5, 4.1/5, 3.8/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg
Combined from 4 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9.

Google Reviews/Maps supplies the largest published review base, at 4.3/5 from 138 reviews, which converts to 7.9/10 and sets the level. The reported complaints about rectification delays, management uncertainty, noise and termites warrant a modest downward adjustment, while repeated praise for views, facilities, location and community offsets part of that movement. Structural scoring is more cautious because the published evidence includes both a 3.9/5 interior sub-score and specific termite/rectification complaints.

+ Modern appliances and fit-out+ Well-regarded interior design+ Conserved heritage blocks integrated with towers
− Termite reports in wood cabinets/furniture− Rectification delays− Occasional severe highway and wind noise
+ Unblocked city and sea views+ Broad facilities offering+ Rail Corridor access+ Active resident community+ Central city-fringe location
− Rectification appointments reportedly late or missed− Management-agent resignation reported− Facilities can be crowded− Highway and wind noise− Nearest MRT reported as a 16-minute walk

PropertyGuru publishes an Interior / Units score of 3.9/5 and includes a review saying, “Wood cabinets are cheaply built and infested with termites.” Another review says traffic and wind noise can become “unbearable,” while the 2023 resident account says affected wood furniture was being replaced and described UOL as efficient in rectifying the reported termite problems.

Reviews praise the “unblocked wonderful day and night views,” infinity pool, karaoke rooms, function rooms and Rail Corridor access. Operational feedback is mixed: one resident reported that the main contractor was late or absent and needed “5+ appointments” for one issue, while another reported management conflict and that the Management Agent had resigned; Google review excerpts also say facilities can be crowded.

Botanique at Bartley19, Singapore797 units
7.4/ 10
—/ 10
7.4/ 10

No eligible review-platform rating was available for scoring because the only published aggregate located was the Property Finder/PropertyGuru figure, which the rules exclude. The score therefore uses the eight written reviews read: seven positive and one negative, with a modest downward adjustment for recurring road noise and management/security criticism; structural performance remains unevidenced.

+ Well-maintained common areas+ Lush landscaping
+ Resort-style facilities+ Lush greenery+ Clean environment+ Near Bartley MRT+ Positive long-term resident feedback
− Road traffic noise− Reported unfriendly management/security− Limited nearby hawker and supermarket amenities

The published comments describe the building and grounds as “well maintained,” with landscaping that became “lush” two years after TOP. No specific published resident evidence was found about plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems, leaks, waterproofing, lifts or other underlying engineering performance.

Residents praised the “resort feel,” wellness pool, aqua gym and forest clubhouse, while another review said the estate was “gorgeous,” “very clean” and convenient. The main operational concern was a report of “Unfriendly staff, whether managment or security,” alongside road noise; separate discussion also described road-facing units as “Quite noisy.”

The Watergardens at Canberra27, Singapore448 units
7.4/ 10
—/ 10
—/ 10

PropertyGuru publishes a 5.0/5 building rating, but it is based on only one review and therefore cannot be used as the scoring anchor under the stated rules. The one written review is positive, but fewer than three written reviews were read, so the overall, structure and living scores remain null; the published evidence is also limited and partly pre-completion or editorial.

+ Low-rise five-storey blocks+ Landscaped greenery+ Two main lap pools+ Enclosed-kitchen options in two-bedroom layouts
− Close spacing between some blocks− Potentially reduced privacy− Potentially hindered airflow− No tennis court− Induction hob instead of gas hob
+ Quiet residential setting+ Resort-style water features+ Adequate facilities for 448 units+ Childcare within the development+ Walkable Canberra MRT access
− Far from major expressways− Longer city commute by car− No tennis court
Not found in sources: Limited retail convenience noted in forum commentary · Limited independent resident feedback

No resident review reported a structural or systems failure. The independent Stacked Homes inspection nevertheless criticised block spacing as close as 6 metres in places, saying it could “hinder the airflow” and “compromise on the privacy” of residents; it also noted the absence of a tennis court and gas hobs in the reviewed layouts.

The sole PropertyGuru resident review called it a “cozy relaxing condo” and praised a quiet life away from stressful city office work. The independent Stacked Homes review praised the two pools and said facilities were “adequate for 448 units,” but found the location less attractive for drivers because it is far from major expressways; current day-to-day management quality remains uncertain because the published resident sample is only one review.

MeyerHouse15, Singapore56 units
7.1/ 10
6.9/ 10
Stacked Homes 4/5, 4.5/5 · no review count · stackedhomes.com
Combined from 2 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9.
6.3/ 10
Stacked Homes 4.5/5, 2.5/5, 4/5, 4.5/5, 3.5/5, 3.5/5, 2/5 · no review count · stackedhomes.com
Combined from 7 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.3.

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest qualifying review base, 15 reviews at 4.2/5, which converts to 7.8 before commentary. The score is moderated by repeated management/security complaints and limited-accessibility/high-cost criticism, with recurring praise preventing a larger reduction; structural evidence supports a separate 7.0 structure view, while living evidence supports 6.6.

+ Premium interiors+ Quality finishings+ Private lift infrastructure
− Bathroom ventilation windows absent− Kitchen viewed as ordinary versus the rest
+ Private lift access+ Park-side location+ Premium interiors+ Concierge service+ Relaxing garden environment
− Management attitude complaints− Security guard conduct complaint− Low accessibility− High maintenance fees− Limited facilities

The available building-focused editorial review rated “Quality of Finishings” 4.5/5 and described the interiors as “suitably upscale and distinguished,” while a separate review called them “all gorgeous and interiors so premium.” It also noted that the bathrooms have no ventilation windows and that the kitchen was the least impressive part, but no resident-reported leaks, flooding, lift failures or other serious systems defects were found.

Daily-life feedback is strongest on privacy and setting: reviewers mention “each house has its own private lift” and a “Great location right beside the park.” The negative operational feedback is consistent across two sources: one resident said management and security “sucked,” while another described management as having an “uppity attitude”; the editorial review also says the development has relatively few facilities and steep maintenance costs.

One Bishopsgate PlazaLondon160 units
7.0/ 10
—/ 10
7.0/ 10

The only building-specific published aggregate located is the Google Reviews/Maps listing at 4.0/5 from 4 reviews, which converts to 7.0/10 under the specified curve. Because the aggregate has fewer than 10 reviews, the result is kept at the conversion level and is treated as low-confidence; no recurring, qualifying complaint or praise theme was used to move it.

+ luxury specifications+ panoramic views+ professional and efficient hotel staff+ infinity pool and wellness facilities
− concern about empty upper floors− hotel/residential separation limits some amenity access

no notes returned

no links returned

Published commentary describes the operational experience positively: Business Traveller called the staff “professional and efficient” with a personal welcome, while a 2026 review described the lobby staff as moving with “conspicuous calm.” Building-specific user comments praise the “beautiful specifications” and the view from the 34th-floor terrace, although one reviewer objected that the upper floors were largely empty and noted that the terrace was residents-only.

The Tre Ver13, Singapore729 units
6.1/ 10
7.9/ 10
PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg
PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9.
7.9/ 10
PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg
PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9.

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base at 3.6/5 from 60 reviews, which converts to 5.8 under the requested curve. The score is pulled down to 5.3 by the reported termite infestation, workmanship and repair problems, management delays and a security complaint, partly offset by repeated praise for facilities, views and quiet surroundings. The structural score is lower than the living score because the available physical-condition evidence is predominantly negative; the July 2026 reporting is current within the requested window, but the number of affected units remains uncertain because the developer and MCST did not provide a full total.

− Termite or wood-borer reports− Built-in cabinet and wardrobe infestation− Bathroom leaks− Unrepaired carpark door− Workmanship and finishing defects
+ Pools and facilities+ Quiet and serene setting+ Riverside views+ Walkable to MRT and amenities+ Some improved management responsiveness
− Management deposit delays− Unresponsive visitor-entry security− Rude security interaction− Repair follow-through complaints

Published reporting in July 2026 said at least 50 units were believed to have experienced termite issues since December 2022; an inspection found signs in fewer than 10 of 61 vacant units checked between December 2022 and April 2023. Residents also reported that “the termites kept appearing” in a developer-built wardrobe, while a Google reviewer said the bathroom had leaked twice and the carpark door remained broken; these are reported defects, not a current engineering certification.

Residents praised the setting and facilities: one called it “quiet and serene,” another said the pools were “absolutely incredible,” and a February 2026 reviewer said the new management team was more efficient and checked the estate daily. Against that, reviewers described “Worst management ever” over an app-deposit delay and reported that security staff failed to respond at the visitor lane and spoke rudely.

Only buildings that have reached handover are rated. 0 of 9 projects carry no rating: a building still under construction is never asked about, one that has just been handed over may not have been reached yet, and the rest were asked about and no published resident commentary was found. Structure is fixed at handover and stays the developer's; management and living belongs to whoever runs the building now. The overall verdict weights both rather than averaging them. None of this is checked: a rating is what people published about a building, aggregated — it is not evidence, it cannot move a delay figure, and it is not part of the delivery record above.

About

Company dossier

Legal name
UOL Group Limited
Headquarters
101 Thomson Road, #33-00, Singapore, Singapore
307591
Founded
1963
Singapore, Singapore
Entity type
PUBLIC LISTED
Revenue
SGD 3.2 billion
FY2025
Business model
offplan for sale, commercial, mixed use

Offices

head office and 3 others
SydneyLondonTianjin

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Commercial (International)

UOL Group Limited
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
value seen: Sydney
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/our-business/commercial/international/

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Commercial (International)

UOL Group Limited
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
value seen: London
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/our-business/commercial/international/

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Commercial (International)

UOL Group Limited
Commercial Sydney, Australia 72 Christie Street Sydney, Australia 388 George Street; The Esplanade Office (海河华鼎) London, United Kingdom 110 High Holborn London, United Kingdom 120 Holborn Island
value seen: Tianjin
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/our-business/commercial/international/

Partners

4 partners
CapitaLand Development
joint venture

PARKTOWN Residence is a 50:50 joint development integrated with a transportation hub.

Kheng Leong
joint venture

Kheng Leong joined UOL in the 80:20 Dorset Road residential site consortium.

China Jinmao Holdings
joint venture

China Jinmao Holdings joined UOL and Kheng Leong in the 7:3:90 THE PUYUAN residential-site joint venture.

Hilton
operator

UOL announced a partnership with Hilton to launch the NoMad hotel in Singapore in 2026.

Sources: name

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50), PARKTOWN Residence is Singapore’s largest residential and lifestyle development integrated with a transportation hub.
value seen: CapitaLand Development
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: partner type

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50)
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: summary

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
Jointly developed by the Group and CapitaLand Development (CLD) (50:50), PARKTOWN Residence is Singapore’s largest residential and lifestyle development integrated with a transportation hub.
value seen: PARKTOWN Residence is a 50:50 joint development integrated with a transportation hub.
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: name

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
value seen: Kheng Leong
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: partner type

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: summary

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In the same month, we formed a 80:20 joint venture with Kheng Leong and successfully secured the Dorset Road residential site.
value seen: Kheng Leong joined UOL in the 80:20 Dorset Road residential site consortium.
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: name

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
value seen: China Jinmao Holdings
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: partner type

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: summary

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
In February 2025, we acquired a government land sales site in Hongkou District, Shanghai ... through a joint venture with Kheng Leong and China Jinmao Holdings on a 7:3:90 basis.
value seen: China Jinmao Holdings joined UOL and Kheng Leong in the 7:3:90 THE PUYUAN residential-site joint venture.
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: name

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
value seen: Hilton
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: partner type

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
value seen: OPERATOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Sources: summary

FILING2026-04-02

UOL Annual Report 2025

UOL Group Limited
UOL announced partnership with Hilton to launch first NoMad Hotel in Asia Pacific, opening in 2026 at the former Faber House site on Orchard Road.
value seen: UOL announced a partnership with Hilton to launch the NoMad hotel in Singapore in 2026.
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/uol-reports/files/UOL-Annual-Report-2025.pdf

Registrations & licences

COMPANY NUMBER196300438C
Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) · Singapore · Live company
Jurisdiction-agnostic: a DLD number, a Companies House number and a state RERA registration all land in the same table.

Contact

Markets

4 countries
Singaporeactive 8 projects tracked
Australiaactive 0 projects tracked
United Kingdomactive 1 project tracked
Chinaactive 0 projects tracked

What they build

6 types
Residential, for sale7 of 9
Hotel2 of 9
Mixed use1 of 9
Hotel residences1 of 9
Office1 of 9
Retail1 of 9
A project counts once under each type it carries, so the shares add to more than the project count.

Management

Principals & executives

6 names found
WE
Wee Ee Lim
UOL’s Chairman since 27 February 2024, Mr Wee is also President and Chief Executive Officer of SGX-listed Haw Par Corporation. His long tenure at Haw Par and board roles across UOL-related listed companies make him a significant governance and ownership-linked figure for investors.
Current title
Chairman
since 27 February 2024
Experience
30+ years management
Companies before
Haw Par Group
Education
Clark UniversityBachelor of Arts (Economics)
Other boards
Singapore Land Group Limited (Chairman)United Overseas Bank LimitedHaw Par Corporation LimitedWee Foundation (Director)
Known for
ChairmanHaw Par President and CEO

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
- Bachelor of Arts (Economics), Clark University, USA
value seen: Bachelor of Arts (Economics), Clark University, USA
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
## Wee Ee Lim Chairman
value seen: Wee Ee Lim
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
- Singapore Land Group Limited (Chairman) - United Overseas Bank Limited - Haw Par Corporation Limited - Wee Foundation (Director)
value seen: Singapore Land Group Limited (Chairman); United Overseas Bank Limited; Haw Par Corporation Limited; Wee Foundation (Director)
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Wee joined the Haw Par Group in 1986
value seen: Haw Par Group
previous company

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
was appointed as Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024.
value seen: 27 February 2024
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Wee, aged 64 (as at date of the upcoming 63 rd AGM), was appointed as Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024.
value seen: appointed as Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024; President and Chief Executive Officer of Haw Par Corporation Limited
value paraphrased from this source
prior roles and current responsibility

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
Mr Wee is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Haw Par Corporation Limited, an SGX-listed company with businesses in the healthcare, leisure, property and investment sectors. Mr Wee joined the Haw Par Group in 1986 and was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in 2003. He has been closely involved in the management and growth of the Haw Par Group for more than 30 years.
value seen: Chairman; President and Chief Executive Officer; more than 30 years
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
## Wee Ee Lim Chairman
value seen: Chairman
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/
LW
Liam Wee Sin
Mr Liam has led UOL’s diversified property and hospitality group since 2019 and has more than 30 years with the Group. His investor-relevant track record includes senior urban-design and developer-industry roles and a focus on design, sustainability, collaboration and long-term value creation.
Current title
Group Chief Executive
since 2019
Experience
30+ years with uol
Companies before
none sourced
Education
University of SingaporeBachelor of Architecture
Other boards
Singapore Land Group LimitedUOL Group LimitedUOL subsidiaries
Known for
Group CEOREDAS
“As a developer we often play the curatorial role, empowering innovation and good design, delivering leadership in the execution, and pushing for collaboration in all that we set out to do.” EdgeProp 28 October 2022https://www.edgeprop.sg/property-news/beyond-profitability-crafting-value-next-measure-success-uol-and-kheng-leong

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
- Bachelor of Architecture, University of Singapore
value seen: Bachelor of Architecture, University of Singapore
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
## Liam Wee Sin Group Chief Executive
value seen: Liam Wee Sin
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
- Singapore Land Group Limited - UOL Group Limited (Group Chief Executive) - Director of various UOL subsidiaries
value seen: Singapore Land Group Limited; UOL Group Limited; UOL subsidiaries
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: quote

PRESS2022-10-28

Beyond profitability, crafting value is the next measure of success for UOL and Kheng Leong

EdgeProp
“As a developer we often play the curatorial role, empowering innovation and good design, delivering leadership in the execution, and pushing for collaboration in all that we set out to do,” says Liam.
value seen: “As a developer we often play the curatorial role, empowering innovation and good design, delivering leadership in the execution, and pushing for collaboration in all that we set out to do.”
https://www.edgeprop.sg/property-news/beyond-profitability-crafting-value-next-measure-success-uol-and-kheng-leong

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019.
value seen: 2019
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
Mr Liam was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019. In his over 30 years of service with the Group, Mr Liam has led and strengthened the Group’s position as a leading diversified property and hospitality company with a global footprint.
value seen: appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019; over 30 years of service; led and strengthened the Group
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
In his over 30 years of service with the Group, Mr Liam has led and strengthened the Group’s position as a leading diversified property and hospitality company with a global footprint. Additionally, Mr Liam was the first vice-president of the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (“REDAS”).
value seen: Group Chief Executive; over 30 years; REDAS
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Board of Directors

UOL Group Limited
## Liam Wee Sin Group Chief Executive
value seen: Group Chief Executive
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/board-of-directors/
NT
Ng Tiang Poh Eric
Mr Ng leads UOL’s finance, tax, treasury and investor-relations functions. He brings more than 25 years across KPMG, Singapore Power and Keppel, including listed-infrastructure-fund CFO experience, supported by accountancy and MBA training.
Current title
Chief Financial Officer
since 2024
Experience
25+ years experience
Companies before
Keppel LimitedSingapore Power GroupKPMG Singapore
Education
University of ManchesterMaster of Business Administration
Nanyang Technological UniversityBachelor of Accountancy (Honours)
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
CFOMBA
https://linkedin.com/in/eric-ng-tiangpoh

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Ng holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Manchester, United Kingdom, and a Bachelor of Accountancy (Honours) degree from the Nanyang Technological University.
value seen: Master of Business Administration, University of Manchester; Bachelor of Accountancy (Honours), Nanyang Technological University
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Ng Tiang Poh Eric Chief Financial Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Ng Tiang Poh Eric
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Before joining UOL, he held various senior roles within large multinational companies, including seven years with Keppel Limited and 10 years with the Singapore Power Group. Mr Ng started his career at KPMG Singapore as an auditor.
value seen: Keppel Limited; Singapore Power Group; KPMG Singapore
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Ng was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2024.
value seen: 2024
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Ng was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2024. He oversees the Finance, Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations functions of the Group. Mr Ng has more than 25 years of experience in large multinational companies.
value seen: appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2024; oversees Finance, Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations; more than 25 years
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Ng has more than 25 years of experience in large multinational companies, handling roles in group reporting, corporate finance, investment management, financial control, corporate tax and treasury.
value seen: CFO; 25+ years; MBA
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Ng Tiang Poh Eric Chief Financial Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Chief Financial Officer
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/
NS
Neo Soon Hup
Mr Neo oversees hospitality asset management, IT, corporate engineering and development, and commercial centre management. He has been with UOL since 2003, previously led PPHG operations, and began his career at PwC.
Current title
Chief Operating Officer
since 1 September 2022
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Pan Pacific Hotels Group LimitedPricewaterhouseCoopers
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
COOPPHG operationsPwC
https://sg.linkedin.com/in/neo-soon-hup-870bb88

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Neo Soon Hup Chief Operating Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Neo Soon Hup
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Prior to this, he was Chief Operating Officer of PPHG since March 2020. Before joining PPHG in 2003, Mr Neo spent more than a decade with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
value seen: Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited; PricewaterhouseCoopers
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Neo was appointed Chief Operating Officer on 1 September 2022.
value seen: 1 September 2022
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Neo was appointed Chief Operating Officer on 1 September 2022. He oversees the asset management of the Group’s hospitality portfolio, information technology, corporate engineering & development and centre management of UOL’s commercial portfolio.
value seen: appointed Chief Operating Officer on 1 September 2022; oversees asset management, IT, engineering and development, and centre management
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Prior to this, he was Chief Operating Officer of PPHG since March 2020. Before joining PPHG in 2003, Mr Neo spent more than a decade with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
value seen: COO; PPHG operations; PwC
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Neo Soon Hup Chief Operating Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Chief Operating Officer
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/
YT
Yvonne Tan
Ms Tan drives strategy development and corporate matters in the Group Chief Executive’s Office and oversees residential marketing and project development. She joined UOL in 2011 after Jones Lang LaSalle and the Defence Science and Technology Agency.
Current title
Chief Corporate and Development Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Jones Lang LaSalleDefence Science and Technology Agency
Education
National University of SingaporeBachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate
Other boards
UOL subsidiariesREDAS alternate Management Committee
Known for
Head of DevelopmentProject developmentReal estate
https://linkedin.com/in/yvonne-tan-bb855025

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Ms Tan holds a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate from the National University of Singapore.
value seen: Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate, National University of Singapore
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Yvonne Tan Chief Corporate and Development Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Yvonne Tan
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
She also serves as a Director of several subsidiaries of the Group and is a Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (REDAS) alternate Management Committee member.
value seen: UOL subsidiaries; REDAS alternate Management Committee
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Prior to that, she had experience working at Jones Lang LaSalle and Defence Science and Technology Agency.
value seen: Jones Lang LaSalle; Defence Science and Technology Agency
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Ms Tan is the Chief Corporate and Development Officer responsible for driving the Group’s strategy development and corporate matters in the Group Chief Executive’s Office. She also oversees the Development business, covering Residential Marketing and Project Development.
value seen: Chief Corporate and Development Officer; drives strategy and corporate matters and oversees Residential Marketing and Project Development
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
She also oversees the Development business, covering Residential Marketing and Project Development. Ms Tan holds a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Real Estate
value seen: Head of Development; Project Development; real estate
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Yvonne Tan Chief Corporate and Development Officer UOL Group Limited
value seen: Chief Corporate and Development Officer
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/
CP
Choe Peng Sum
Mr Choe runs PPHG’s worldwide hotel and serviced-apartment strategy, development, management and operations. He has more than 40 years in global hospitality, including senior leadership at Frasers Hospitality and earlier experience with Shangri-La.
Current title
Chief Executive Officer, Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
since 1 September 2019
Experience
40+ years hospitality
Companies before
Frasers Property LimitedFrasers Hospitality International LtdShangri-La hotel group
Education
Cornell UniversityBachelor of Science (Distinction)
Other boards
Frasers Hospitality Trust (board director)
Known for
Subsidiary CEOex-Frasers
https://linkedin.com/in/peng-sum-choe-05bb95109
“We remain focused on establishing the brand as a trusted global hospitality group.” Hotel Management 15 March 2024https://www.hotelmanagement.com.au/2024/03/15/exclusive-pan-pacific-hotels-group-ceo-on-repositioning-brands-for-global-growth/

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Choe graduated with a Bachelor of Science (Distinction) degree from Cornell University (Ithaca, New York).
value seen: Bachelor of Science (Distinction), Cornell University
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Choe Peng Sum Chief Executive Officer Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
value seen: Choe Peng Sum
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
He was previously chief executive officer of Frasers Hospitality International Ltd and also board of director for the Frasers Hospitality Trust.
value seen: Frasers Hospitality Trust (board director)
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Prior to joining PPHG, Mr Choe was senior adviser to Frasers Property Limited. He was previously chief executive officer of Frasers Hospitality International Ltd
value seen: Frasers Property Limited; Frasers Hospitality International Ltd; Shangri-La hotel group
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: quote

PRESS2024-03-15

Exclusive: Pan Pacific Hotels Group CEO on repositioning brands for global growth

Hotel Management
At Pan Pacific Hotels Group, we remain focused on establishing the brand as a trusted global hospitality group.
value seen: “We remain focused on establishing the brand as a trusted global hospitality group.”
https://www.hotelmanagement.com.au/2024/03/15/exclusive-pan-pacific-hotels-group-ceo-on-repositioning-brands-for-global-growth/

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
Mr Choe was appointed Chief Executive Officer of PPHG on 1 September 2019.
value seen: 1 September 2019
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
With over 40 years of global hospitality experience, he leads PPHG’s overall strategy, overseeing the development, management, and operations of its hotels and serviced apartments worldwide. Prior to joining PPHG, Mr Choe was senior adviser to Frasers Property Limited.
value seen: appointed CEO of PPHG on 1 September 2019; leads global hotel and serviced-apartment strategy, development, management and operations; previously senior adviser to Frasers Property
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
With over 40 years of global hospitality experience
value seen: Subsidiary CEO; 40+ years hospitality; ex-Frasers
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
tags

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

UOL Group Limited - Senior Management

UOL Group Limited
## Choe Peng Sum Chief Executive Officer Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
value seen: Chief Executive Officer Pan Pacific Hotels Group Limited
https://www.uol.com.sg/about-uol/management-team/

Projects

Assessment coverage

Completed projects: 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15. Initial research is capped at 10 completed projects and a separate delivery-risk search capped at 7 findings. Risk findings are not project assessment counts. Absence is not proof of a complete portfolio or no failures. Month-level dates overlapping a boundary are excluded from figures.

0 undated completions and 1 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.

Stalled, cancelled & overdue projects

0 evidenced cases
The capped delivery-risk search ran; no project-level exception cases are recorded here. Risk findings are listed under Risks and are separate from assessed projects. This does not establish that the developer has no delivery failures.

Completed projects

9 projects
ProjectLocationTypeUnitsFloorsAreaCostPayment planLaunchedConstruction startOriginal targetHandoverDelayConfidenceStatus
The Watergardens at CanberraSingapore, Singapore
27
residential for sale4481five——5% (Booking Fee); 20% less Booking Fee; 10%; 10%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 25%; 15%1202128 August 2021Jul 2024 – Dec 2024Jul 2025+9.5 mo
(+7.0 to +12.0)
sourcedcompleted
ClavonSingapore, Singapore
05
residential for sale6401———5% (Booking Fee) / 20% less Booking Fee / 10% / 10% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 25% / 15%1202012 December 2020Jul 2023 – Dec 2023May 2025+19.5 mo
(+17.0 to +22.0)
sourcedcompleted
Pan Pacific OrchardSingapore, Singapore
hotel347123 storeys———2018April 2018Jan 2021 – Dec 2021Oct 2023+27.5 mo
(+22.0 to +33.0)
sourcedcompleted
Avenue South ResidenceSingapore, Singapore
02
residential for sale1,0741Two 56-storey towers plus five conserved four-storey apartment blocks——5% (Booking Fee); 20% less Booking Fee; 10%; 10%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 5%; 25%; 15%12019September 2019Apr 2022 – Jun 2022Jul 2023+14.0 mo
(+13.0 to +15.0)
sourcedcompleted
MeyerHouseSingapore, Singapore
15
residential for sale561————20191 June 2019Apr 2023Jan 2022 – Dec 2022dates under reviewdates under reviewcompleted
The Tre VerSingapore, Singapore
13
residential for sale7291———5% (Booking Fee), 20% less Booking Fee, 10%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 25%, 15%120184 August 2018Jan 2021 – Dec 2021Jan 2022 – Dec 2022+12.0 mo
(+1.0 to +23.0)
sourcedcompleted
One Bishopsgate PlazaLondon, United Kingdom
mixed use, hotel, hotel residences, office, retail160143 storeys50,000 m²—10% / 90%1———Sep 2021—not scorablecompleted
Botanique at BartleySingapore, Singapore
19
residential for sale7971Nine blocks of 17-storey apartments———20142014Jan 2019 – Dec 2019Jul 2019+0.5 mo
(−5.0 to +6.0)
sourcedcompleted
The Clement CanopySingapore, Singapore
05
residential for sale5051Two 40-storey tower blocks———2017February 2017Oct 2020 – Dec 2020Mar 2019more than 9 months earlyestimatedcompleted
Click any row for the sources behind it. Cost basis matters: an estimated cost, a construction loan and a sale price are different numbers. Each row states which one it is, so they are never averaged together.

Awards

Awards & recognition

7 found
COMPANY AWARD Winner 16 October 2025
Top Developer — EdgeProp Singapore Excellence Awards 2025
UOL Group was named Top Developer at the 2025 EdgeProp Singapore Excellence Awards.
COMPANY AWARD Winner 8 November 2024
Best Developer — PropertyGuru Asia Property Awards (Singapore) 2024
UOL won Best Developer at the 2024 Singapore awards, its third win in the category; the ceremony took place on 8 November 2024.
SUSTAINABILITY Winner 31 October 2025
Best Sustainable Developer — PropertyGuru Asia Property Awards (Singapore) 2025
UOL was among the developer award winners for Best Sustainable Developer at the 2025 Singapore awards; UOL reports that it won the title for the third consecutive year.
COMPANY AWARD Winner 31 October 2025
Best Residential Developer — PropertyGuru Asia Property Awards (Singapore) 2025
UOL was recognised as Best Residential Developer at the 2025 Singapore awards.
SUSTAINABILITY Winner 2025
Singapore Corporate Sustainability Award — Big Cap
UOL won the Singapore Corporate Sustainability Award in the Big Cap category at the 2025 SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards, recognising its progress in climate accountability, transparency and sustainability integration.
Securities Investors Association (Singapore) (SIAS) Investors’ Choice Awards · https://www.uol.com.sg/news/uol-wins-first-singapore-corporate-sustainability-award-by-sias/
SAFETY / QUALITY Winner 7 October 2022
Most Transparent Company Award — Real Estate
UOL won the Most Transparent Company Award in the real estate category at the 2022 SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards.
Securities Investors Association (Singapore) (SIAS) Investors’ Choice Awards · https://uolhomes.com.sg/collab-article/uol-and-singland-recognised-at-prestigious-sias-investors-cho…
RANKING Ranked 2024
Top 100 Singapore Brands 2024 (#34)
UOL was ranked 34th in Brand Finance’s Top 100 Singapore Brands 2024.

Risks

Auditor & credit ratings

audited accounts
AuditorPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Risk flags

4 found
SAFETY / LABOUR Reported January 28, 2025; incident date not stated in the retrieved page
A Bangladeshi worker employed by Nardev Builders died after falling into collapsed soil during lifting work at the Clifford Centre redevelopment site, which was being developed by S.L. Properties, a Singapore Land Group subsidiary and therefore a UOL Group subsidiary; Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower investigated and ordered main contractor Woh Hup to halt substructure works. SingLand said it was saddened and would support the family; the source does not report a finding of liability against UOL or SingLand.
RISK Reported July 27, 2026; reported complaints at The Tre Ver dated from December 2022 onward
Residents of UOL-developed The Tre Ver reported recurring drywood-termite infestations in built-in wardrobes and cabinets; the developer said about 15 homeowners were affected, while a former resident cited at least 50 complaints, and UOL said it would arrange inspections and remedial measures. The report also described similar termite findings at UOL’s Avenue South Residence; BCA said termite infestation is a defect, while noting that the issues did not necessarily affect UOL’s overall quality banding.
LEGAL Judgment dated August 19, 2021; purchasers took possession in June 2013 and UOL filed the application on June 19, 2020
Purchasers in a dispute with UOL Development (Dakota) alleged that the developer failed or refused to rectify defective, structurally unsafe casement windows at Waterbank at Dakota and identified 146 defective items; the High Court did not determine the defects merits, but held that UOL was entitled to release of the S$64,450 stakeholding sum under the applicable dispute mechanism, while partly allowing the purchasers’ appeal concerning interest after UOL’s delayed application.
DELIVERY DELAY 14 August 2020 (delay reported); May 2025 (subsequent completion reported)
UOL Group’s Clavon residential project at Clementi Avenue 1 had its launch postponed from Q3 2020 to Q4 2020 because of COVID-19; UOL subsequently reported that Clavon obtained its Certificate of Statutory Completion in May 2025, so this is resolved historical delay rather than a current non-delivery issue.

Record status

active
Coverageactive
Tracked sinceOctober 11, 2026
Last checkedOctober 12, 2026 this month
Profile last researchedOctober 12, 2026
Claim
Work for this company? Claiming lets you correct the record with sources and get alerts when it changes.
For informational purposes only. This information is not investment, financial or credit advice and should not be relied on for investment, lending or credit decisions. Records may be incomplete or outdated. Verify information independently and seek qualified advice before making a decision.